Chris Keen Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 The law of averages? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forddriver Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Oops I see now, just because someone is#1 doesn't mean they have all 100% classifiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedog Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 If how I place on a classifier is based on who shot it best.....someone should be at 100%. Thought that's the way it works. Is there a list of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted May 12, 2013 Share Posted May 12, 2013 If how I place on a classifier is based on who shot it best.....someone should be at 100%. Thought that's the way it works. Is there a list of that?That's right but different from the top 20 list..... You're looking at a list of "the average of the 6 best of the most recent 8"....... A lot of the newer classifiers -- at least the 03 and 06 series -- were shot a area matches and nationals before they became classifiers. At one point, and possibly still today for some, the 100% equivalent was the hit factor for the winning run.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedog Posted May 12, 2013 Share Posted May 12, 2013 Ok, I got it. Wonder why there's no list of that? I know they won't list hit factor, but it would be cool to see who set the mark. Top 20 list, the way it's done, seems sort of pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now