Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Dawson/Shooters Connection front sight.


Julien Boit

Recommended Posts

I just purchased a .110 Dawson specially made fiber FS.

They are available only through Shooter's Connection.

Any of you have the same set up ?

I tried the .090 but found t too small, the .125 is ok but I wanna give the .110 a try.

Any advice, appreciation is welcomed.

I also wanna try the green rod with it , somebody uses them ?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Julian,

I just put a Dawson .1" on my pistol.

Its well made and the service was awesome. I wanted an .09 but they don't yet serrate them. I have been suprised by the extra width, it really is a great sight picture, but I know I couldn't tolerate any less light around the post.

I bought it because its about the only ready made sight which is serrated, so mostly I've shot the dot blacked out

I know you know all the pros and cons of the optic, I'm still not happy that its the way to go for me, though obviously there are times when it is an advantage.

I shot a steel match with it a couple of weeks ago and managed to shoot reasonably without ever switching my focus back to the F/S, (or should I say being aware of doing so)

For me even blacked out the 'dot' is a distraction, when I look at the F/S I always look right at the dot which is fine on close open IPSC targets but doesn't help at all on tight shots or the longer ranges of the NRA mover for example.

Good luck with your purchase,

P.D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I have a non-standard cut on the slide on my Para, I had George of EGW make me a new front sight.

0.10 with serrations, red insert, widen the rear notch and reblue as required.

I can only say I wish I had done this a year or more ago. I used to use a step sight, 0.090 down to about 0.030, very accurate, but also not fast enough for old eyes.

If you want a width that you don't see listed or you want other special work, I highly recommend EGW. (Plug mode off)

Jim Norman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dawson used to make an "Indoor" fiber optic, which I have on my Para. Lust a little bit longer than the current model, and it takes the larger diameter rods. I LOVE that sight, and wish I could find one for my Les Baer.

I have tried the green color insert, but I just like the red better. Personal preferance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok guys, here is my report from the trial of the front sight change.

About the width, I didn't noticed a real change from the .125 to the .110.

It seems identical to me, for the moment, maybe I need more time.

As for the green insert, I like it. It's a little bit less disturbing for my eyes, and for hard shots, I can focus more easily on the square of the sight.

I think I'm gonna keep it this way.

At the same match, I tried a thumb rest too.

I need to try it with "softer" ammo, those were chronoed at 191 PF :D

Something around 175 will be better. I found a little more control on double taps.

More investigating to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it does.

But I have to do more testing to get used to.

My biggest fear was that I would be unable to put my thumb back on it when running, or after a mag change, but my thumb found , almost naturally, its place on the rest.

But as I said, I'll have to test it with softer ammo, but if it works with "handcannon ammos", It should work with puffy 175 PF loads :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the trick is to not apply too much pressure on it.

I found it allows me faster split times on close targets, but it also allows me to track a little bit more my front sight, more consistently.

But I would need more time to confirm or not if I'm gonna keep it on the pistols.

I also put one on my shorty 38 super, need to practice a lot now ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Julien. I was finally able to test the thumbrest last weekend. My first impressions were the gun actually shot flatter with the weak thumb now having an active role in recoil control. I didn't notice any torquing or erratic tracking of the front sight, probably because the thumb rest was fit right to my thumb.

However, being used to the front-ejection-when -racking-the-slide method, I'm now forced to rack the slide using the rear serrations. This method needs some getting used to more than hte thumbrest. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pistols tends to point a little high.

I only tried with a short dustcover frame and classic 5" slide, maybe a full profile and long framed pistol would stay flatter. Also, I had to trim a bit the thumbrest to fit the holster and the box.

But I found nothing that makes the pick more difficult.

I'm gonna post some pics later .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the beast :

STIThumbrest.jpg

I think there are a couple of things to do to try to put the pistol flat.

Using a "big" thumb safety, like the swenson, the one currently on the pistol is the original STI safety. Or trying to trim the side of the thumbrest with an angle.

But as I said in the previous post, maybe a "muzzle heavy" pistol wouldn't sit the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Julien,

looking at the pics, I guess there is no way to have that gun (or a long dustcovered one) lay flat or, better, muzzle down.

The thumbrest providing propping is nowhere near the center of gravity of the whole thing, and it gets worse when the gun is fully loaded, because the CG shifts towards the grip, not towards the muzzle.

The only solution is what you already pointed out: a wider left-side safety to prop up the back of the gun.

Or, maybe screwing in a small slide racker in the bottom left side of the slide... :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a long dust cover and my pistol lays the same way as Julien's. Because of the thumbrest, I no longer have any fear of using an extended mag button.

Drifting here a bit, but I just have to ask. If you position the gun that way in the box and the muzzle sticks out of the max depth because it's angled, is it no longer box-compliant? :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...