cassidy Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 I have a 9mm 5" XD and I am looking for some smooth/accurate ammo which will be shot exclusivly at 25 yards. I am not worried about PF and I am not set up to reload at this time. I have been looking at a bulk order from percision delta, and for the type of shooting I want to do, I dont know the difference between 115g, 124g or 147g. Or the advantage between FMJ and JHP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshidaex Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 (edited) There are claims the JHP are a bit more accurate than FMJ bullets due to the JHP having a bit more of load bearing surface which help stabalize the bullet before leabing the barrel. It would be best to pick up 50 or 100 rounds of each weight and see which one is to your liking. Edited May 18, 2011 by yoshidaex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racerba Posted May 18, 2011 Share Posted May 18, 2011 another question would be, will you be shooting at any knock down steel? if yes, the 147 gr would be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hi-Power Jack Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 I have a 9mm 5" XD and I am looking for some smooth/accurate ammo I am not worried about PF My Browning shoots 147 gr bullets more accurately than 115 or 124's, but you might find the opposite. Depends, of course, on your definition of "accuracy" - for some 3" at 25 yards is fine, others look for 1 1/2" at 25 yds. You will have to try different loads (powders, amounts of powder and bullets at different OAL's to determine what works best in YOUR gun. If pf is not important, start with the lowest recommended amounts of powder and see if it functions in your gun and is accurate. No generic shortcuts - it's all work:)) My kind of work:))) Good luck. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whistlepig Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 Some guns like or dislike diff loads...... get a sample of several and see what your gun likes. You can see what functions well, groups accurate and feels best to shoot. Go from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe4d Posted May 19, 2011 Share Posted May 19, 2011 the grains is the weight of the bullet, there are 7000 grains to the pound, its an old weight measurement having to do with an actual grain, barley I think. Almost all 9mm's shoot 124 gr bullets well. Almost all 9mm's shoot 115's at least ok, many 9mm's wont shoot 147's but some shoot them best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calishootr Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 another question would be what 'effect' recoilwize areyou looking for??? for example 115's typically are 'snappier' where the heavier 147's give more of a softer 'push' all depends on what you are looking for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob DuBois Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 Some of my IDPA friends that don't reload seem to prefer UMC or Federal Champion because of lighter recoil. Their shooting 115gn loads as they are easier to find and cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-ManBart Posted May 20, 2011 Share Posted May 20, 2011 There are claims the JHP are a bit more accurate than FMJ bullets due to the JHP having a bit more of load bearing surface which help stabalize the bullet before leabing the barrel. Not all JHPs have more bearing surface than similar weight FMJ/CMJ/etc. Bearing surface isn't what makes JHPs more accurate, on average, than other styles. It's almost entirely about the method of making the two different kinds of bullets. The process, and equipment required to make a JHP causes them to be more consistent, and that leads to greater accuracy. If bearing surface was the most important factor in accuracy, heavy, or heavier, bullets would always be more accurate than light bullets, and that simply isn't the case. R, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshidaex Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 Not all JHPs have more bearing surface than similar weight FMJ/CMJ/etc. Bearing surface isn't what makes JHPs more accurate, on average, than other styles. It's almost entirely about the method of making the two different kinds of bullets. The process, and equipment required to make a JHP causes them to be more consistent, and that leads to greater accuracy. If bearing surface was the most important factor in accuracy, heavy, or heavier, bullets would always be more accurate than light bullets, and that simply isn't the case. R, Good to know you're always on top of the info game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01G8R Posted May 21, 2011 Share Posted May 21, 2011 G-manBart Can you expand on the how the bullets are made and how the machinery is different? I understand the basics of how the slugs and cups are made and assembled, but I've never seen it done. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cali shot doc Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 i prefer 115g out of my xd9 tactical production gun. Seems to have a lighter recoil, more accurate and faster site acquisition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee G Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 There are claims the JHP are a bit more accurate than FMJ bullets due to the JHP having a bit more of load bearing surface which help stabalize the bullet before leabing the barrel.Not all JHPs have more bearing surface than similar weight FMJ/CMJ/etc. Bearing surface isn't what makes JHPs more accurate, on average, than other styles. It's almost entirely about the method of making the two different kinds of bullets. The process, and equipment required to make a JHP causes them to be more consistent, and that leads to greater accuracy. If bearing surface was the most important factor in accuracy, heavy, or heavier, bullets would always be more accurate than light bullets, and that simply isn't the case. R, According to the "ABC's of Reloading" hollow points are more accurate because it moves the center of mass further back. Seeing as how I'm not an engineer or physicist I'm only capable of regurgitating information and have no real opinion what-so-ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coulter6 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 I get my 9mm at Walmart - 100 rd value pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpeltier Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 (edited) G-manBart Can you expand on the how the bullets are made and how the machinery is different? I understand the basics of how the slugs and cups are made and assembled, but I've never seen it done. Thanks. I would add to this that it Is due to a differance in bullet construction, but not necessarily the machinery. The typical fmj bullet is open in the back and the lead is exposed to the hot gasses upon ignition of the gun powder. Cmj and Jhp do not have the lead exposed. I have found no differance between like bullets with a closed base. And to add to this most fmj are very high production practice bullets that may not get the same quality control and scrutiny that a more premium bullet recieves. Edited June 5, 2011 by mpeltier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankge Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 i'm beginning to find its not a question of recoil so much as how you prefer the sights to track. I'm still farting around with 124's loaded at power factor. 147s are nice but I like a bit of response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankge Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 btw - im finding the Montana Gold CMJs pretty darn accurate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckfarris Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 I have been using 124gr JHP from precision delta. I have thought about switching to 147gr bullets but the 124gr have not failed me yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankge Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 124MGs work for me at PF, found I like some snap over the softer push of 147s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 124MGs work for me at PF, found I like some snap over the softer push of 147s Many top level shooters love 147's but a large number have also come to the same conclusion as you and I that a little bit of snap is better. I personally felt 147's were just too sluggish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twodownzero Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 I have shot 147s for years. I shoot 135s now because my Spartan 9mm likes them, but I am probably going to 160s for everything. People might think that heavier bullets are sluggish, but your slide still cycles faster than you can shoot. I tend to think it's all in your head. I really do like the 147s, though, and if they'd shoot in all of my guns, I'd stick with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 I have shot 147s for years. I shoot 135s now because my Spartan 9mm likes them, but I am probably going to 160s for everything. People might think that heavier bullets are sluggish They are but your slide still cycles faster than you can shoot. Technically true I tend to think it's all in your head. What in this game isn't? Just like any other game with a huge mental component what is in any shooters head matters a bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now