Duane Thomas Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 A friend of mine recently purchased a Springfield Mil-Spec and the traditional spur grip safety/spur hammer combo is just eating his hand alive. Any reason not so simply solve the problem by trimming the hammer short? Any functional or other problems that might attend that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
want2race Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 I've done it. It still works (gun functions fine). It may also still eat his hand until he installs a better grip safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamf_shadow Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 You can trim it but understand that you are removing mass. Most factory pistols use an uneccesarily heavy main spring so you probably won't have any issues with light strikes. If you do then consider a heavier main spring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anachronism Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 One of the slickest 1911s I've ever seen had the hammer spur reduced, and the stock grip safety reprofiled to be bite proof. It was a work of art. I've always wanted to do one this way myself. I wish I'd have taken pictures of it when I could. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Thomas Posted April 30, 2011 Author Share Posted April 30, 2011 You can trim it but understand that you are removing mass. Most factory pistols use an uneccesarily heavy main spring so you probably won't have any issues with light strikes. If you do then consider a heavier main spring. I have about 32k rounds through my Wilson 1911 with 17-pound mainspring (which is the same thing I've already installed in my friend's Springfield) without a single problem with light strikes, even on Wolf primers, and I doubt a trimmed spur hammer would be lighter than the almost completely hollow Comander-style hammer on my Wilson gun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blind bat Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 IANAG, (I am not a gunsmith) but I would think a lighter hammer would mean less chance of light strikes. Less energy required to move the hammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Gonsalves Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 (edited) One of the slickest 1911s I've ever seen had the hammer spur reduced, and the stock grip safety reprofiled to be bite proof. It was a work of art. I've always wanted to do one this way myself. I wish I'd have taken pictures of it when I could. Like this? It was done by Ted Yost Edited April 30, 2011 by Brian Gonsalves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anachronism Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 One of the slickest 1911s I've ever seen had the hammer spur reduced, and the stock grip safety reprofiled to be bite proof. It was a work of art. I've always wanted to do one this way myself. I wish I'd have taken pictures of it when I could. Like this? It was done by Ted Yost Very similar. The one I handled truly had the feel of a used bar of soap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trader Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 I eliminated the hammer spur on my Hi Power years back. Hammer falls is much quicker and no chance of bite. The only way to put the hammer on full cock is to rack the slide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now