kevinj308 Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 I can see wanting a non lethal way to mark unarmed suspects. But why does that entail melting down their sidearms? http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/04/border-patrol-replaces-guns-with-nlaim-die-markers/ Kevin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cy Soto Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 I can see wanting a non lethal way to mark unarmed suspects. But why does that entail melting down their sidearms? http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/04/border-patrol-replaces-guns-with-nlaim-die-markers/ Kevin Kinda interesting that this news report came out on April 1st! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinj308 Posted April 1, 2011 Author Share Posted April 1, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GentlemanJim Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 With the folks we have in charge You have to think twice, to see the joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facelessman Posted April 2, 2011 Share Posted April 2, 2011 Old news!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now