TMC Posted July 16, 2010 Share Posted July 16, 2010 At a local non-USPSA match last week a competitors Glock went full auto after a reload and pressing the slide stop. The shooter was shooting through a barrel and when the gun went off the competitor pulled back allowing the 10 rounds to strike the ground about 10 feet in front and strafe out to the berm. The MD and RO were conferring on how to handle the situation saying the gun was DQ'ed but not the competitor. I butted in saying you cannot DQ a gun only declare it unsafe. I said the competitor did not control the gun and keep it on target so he should be DQ's for an AD/unsafe gun handling. I added, had the shooter kept the gun on target he could have been stopped and the stage scored from that point. Then the gun declared unsafe and the shooter given a chance to fix it or find another gun and continue the match. The shooter was DQ'd. Has anyone else dealt with full auto? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted July 16, 2010 Share Posted July 16, 2010 The shooter was shooting through a barrel and when the gun went off the competitor pulled back allowing the 10 rounds to strike the ground about 10 feet in front and strafe out to the berm. I said the competitor did not control the gun Those two statements appear to be in conflict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Cheely Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 Didn't shoot the prop, within a meter of his feet, and rounds didn't leave the range. I'd say the gun is unsafe, but the competitor shouldn't be DQ'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
driver8M3 Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 is it the general rule at these non-uspsa matches that uspsa rules are in play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasOPM Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 Per USPSA rules he shouldn't have been DQ'd. I have no idea what the "non-USPSA" rules are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbbean Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 If the rounds went down range and not over the berm, I'd say the shooter kept things safe. Bag the gun as unsafe per 5.1.6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 Didn't shoot the prop, within a meter of his feet, and rounds didn't leave the range. I'd say the gun is unsafe, but the competitor shouldn't be DQ'd. I think you meant, "...a shot which strikes the ground within 10 feet of the competitor..." Agreed, not a DQ under our rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe4d Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 we cant really discuss a rules interpretation when there are no rules to interpret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMC Posted July 17, 2010 Author Share Posted July 17, 2010 For clarity I said non-USPSA club not non-USPSA rules. They do follow the USPSA rule book Didn't shoot the prop, within a meter of his feet, and rounds didn't leave the range. I'd say the gun is unsafe, but the competitor shouldn't be DQ'd. If the rounds went down range and not over the berm, I'd say the shooter kept things safe. Bag the gun as unsafe per 5.1.6. So you guys are saying that if the targets are being engaged from one position and the competitor move the fires 10 rounds just anywhere (ground, berm, in the prop) that is ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Miles Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 For clarity I said non-USPSA club not non-USPSA rules. They do follow the USPSA rule book Didn't shoot the prop, within a meter of his feet, and rounds didn't leave the range. I'd say the gun is unsafe, but the competitor shouldn't be DQ'd. If the rounds went down range and not over the berm, I'd say the shooter kept things safe. Bag the gun as unsafe per 5.1.6. So you guys are saying that if the targets are being engaged from one position and the competitor move the fires 10 rounds just anywhere (ground, berm, in the prop) that is ok? Yup! USPSA rules spell out the criteria for a DQ and this lucky gent with a load in his pants didn't break any of them. CYa, Pat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbbean Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 So you guys are saying that if the targets are being engaged from one position and the competitor move the fires 10 rounds just anywhere (ground, berm, in the prop) that is ok? Are the rounds going over the berm, within 10 feet of the competitor or behind the 180? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMC Posted July 17, 2010 Author Share Posted July 17, 2010 For clarity I said non-USPSA club not non-USPSA rules. They do follow the USPSA rule book Didn't shoot the prop, within a meter of his feet, and rounds didn't leave the range. I'd say the gun is unsafe, but the competitor shouldn't be DQ'd. If the rounds went down range and not over the berm, I'd say the shooter kept things safe. Bag the gun as unsafe per 5.1.6. So you guys are saying that if the targets are being engaged from one position and the competitor move the fires 10 rounds just anywhere (ground, berm, in the prop) that is ok? Yup! USPSA rules spell out the criteria for a DQ and this lucky gent with a load in his pants didn't break any of them. CYa, Pat So you guys are saying that if the targets are being engaged from one position and the competitor move the fires 10 rounds just anywhere (ground, berm, in the prop) that is ok? Are the rounds going over the berm, within 10 feet of the competitor or behind the 180? So just to beat this to death, how is this different than a shooter moving between positions and letting one go? It seems to me its an AD since he was backing away from the position and wasn't engaging any targets? 10.4.6 A shot which occurs during movement, except while actually shooting at targets. Or maybe we owe the guy and apology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 That last part (about movement) can be a bit subjective. Without being there to see it I can't say for certain whether the correct call was made. I'm not sure anyone else can, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbbean Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 So just to beat this to death, how is this different than a shooter moving between positions and letting one go? It seems to me its an AD since he was backing away from the position and wasn't engaging any targets? 10.4.6 A shot which occurs during movement, except while actually shooting at targets. Or maybe we owe the guy and apology. I would argue he was actually shooting at a target when the gun went full auto. If he took a step or two back while it was unloading, he was simply dealing with the problem. Maybe he thought it was safer to spray downrange instead of bounce around in the port. Although "intent" arguments are always iffy, the situation described doesn't sound like the situation the rule is intended to address - someone with poor trigger discipline who squeezes off rounds unintentionally. I still think the crux of the issue is that faced with an unexpected malfunction, the shooter managed to keep the rounds in a safe direction. The situation could have been much worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vluc Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 interesting post - a non-USPSA match wanting rules clarification for USPSA. How do you run a non-USPSA match with USPSA rules? Seems you can call it whatever you want. Give us a view of the stage and we can probably answer the movement question a little better. he may have put rounds in the ground well in front of a target - can't say he was not engaging. An AD while moving is a whole nother kettle of fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 In the context of a USPSA -- I've never seen that happen, though I seem to vaguely remember hearing guns double or triple occasionally... Clearly this is a surprise to both shooter and RO. Assuming that all rounds went in a safe direction, and eventually impacted the berm or floor of the pit without anything going over the berm, and assuming that the shooter broke no other safety rules, I'd be inclined to let the shooter continue with another gun. I'd probably also be lenient on movement if the competitor needed to take a step or two to help control the blaster.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-ManBart Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 (edited) For clarity I said non-USPSA club not non-USPSA rules. They do follow the USPSA rule book Actually, you said "non-USPSA match", not non-USPSA club or non-USPSA rules. When I hear someone say it's a non-USPSA match, I'm assuming it's not going to follow USPSA rule strictly, or at all, so I think that was why folks asked the question...your clarification that they follow the USPSA rules clears that up though R, Edited July 17, 2010 by G-ManBart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztecdriver Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 I hate to say this - but 10.4.6 A shot which occurs during movement, except while actually shooting at targets. - Reread OP - they were backing out of the position and reloading - AND the gun went nuts after releasing the slide with the slide stop lever. 10.4 states "CAUSES" --- and I think someone could argue that the SHOOTER didn't cause the shot to occur during this time - but that's not what 10.4 says - It states an Accidental Discharge IS: (see the above) Smarter people than I can figure it out - I just wanted to point out my reading of the rule and the unfortunate situation for the competitor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skizeks Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 If he is backing away from the barrel but still shooting through the barrel. It would be hard to say he was not engaging a target! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schutzenmeister Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 In the context of a USPSA -- I've never seen that happen, though I seem to vaguely remember hearing guns double or triple occasionally... [...] OK ... It's been a few years, but I recall Ron Avery going full auto at the Limited Nationals in Fredreicksburg, VA in (I think) 1997. No, that's not yesterday, and it is 2 or 3 versions of the rule book back. However ... He kept all rounds in the berm and in an otherwise safe direction. He was NOT DQ'd. (He did zero that stage, though!) He was somewhat less than pleased with his (XXX) gun and (YYY) gunsmith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wide45 Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 It's not clear from the description of the event. Glock went full auto after a reload and pressing the slide stop. If the gun AD'ed when the slide closed, and just kept going, it's during a reload and a DQ. If the competitor had completed the reload, and was engaging a target, and kept all rounds within the backstop, no DQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfchorn Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 It's not clear from the description of the event. Glock went full auto after a reload and pressing the slide stop. If the gun AD'ed when the slide closed, and just kept going, it's during a reload and a DQ. If the competitor had completed the reload, and was engaging a target, and kept all rounds within the backstop, no DQ. Agree on both points. Remember, there is no more "equipment malfunction" alibi anymore. If it happened during a load, reload, remedial action or unload sequence (except for a detonation), it is a DQ. If it hit within 10 feet of the competitor or goes over the berm, it's a DQ. If it happens while moving, unless the competitor is engaging a target, it's a DQ. If the competitor was engaging targets at the time, the gun gets bagged, but not the shooter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 It's not clear from the description of the event. Glock went full auto after a reload and pressing the slide stop. If the gun AD'ed when the slide closed, and just kept going, it's during a reload and a DQ. If the competitor had completed the reload, and was engaging a target, and kept all rounds within the backstop, no DQ. Ummm, not so fast -- we now have a definition for reloading: Reloading . . . . . . . . . . . . .The replenishment or the insertion of additional ammunition into a firearm. Mag's in, the reload's complete. If the gun goes bang when the slide closes (once or multiple times) it's no longer during the reload.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrumpyOne Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 It's not clear from the description of the event. Glock went full auto after a reload and pressing the slide stop. If the gun AD'ed when the slide closed, and just kept going, it's during a reload and a DQ. If the competitor had completed the reload, and was engaging a target, and kept all rounds within the backstop, no DQ. Ummm, not so fast -- we now have a definition for reloading: Reloading . . . . . . . . . . . . .The replenishment or the insertion of additional ammunition into a firearm. Mag's in, the reload's complete. If the gun goes bang when the slide closes (once or multiple times) it's no longer during the reload.... Very true. Why would he have hit the slide release if the mag was not inserted? Therefore the reload was complete, and the full auto happened after the reload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guns_and_labs Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 (edited) I also was there, and witnessed the event. The gun went off after he hit the slide release, the shots were not closer than 10 feet, and he was not moving to a new position (he actually looked like he was re-engaging the same target array). By the way, most of that club (it seemed) was at a RO Level 1 class last weekend, and there were several spirited discussions of the incident. Most seemed to think that the shooter was owed an apology and not a DQ, but it was not unanimous. Edited July 23, 2010 by guns_and_labs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now