JThompson Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 (edited) This one says, "gun laying flat on table" it does not say anything about a prop of some sort. GAMER ALERT!! Given the "flat on table" line I would not allow it, but you can bet people are going to try or have done so. I'd like to see a no prop line in there if that's what they want. The flat on table makes gamers think they just didn't want the gun vertical.... JT Edited September 29, 2010 by JThompson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecichlid Posted October 1, 2010 Author Share Posted October 1, 2010 My open gun doesn't have a racker on it yet... Mine doesn't either, I have given thought to adding one but I have just gotten used to racking it as needed without a racker. Granted the kickstand feature would be a nice additiion. Joe W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave.O Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 My open gun doesn't have a racker on it yet... Mine doesn't either, I have given thought to adding one but I have just gotten used to racking it as needed without a racker. Granted the kickstand feature would be a nice additiion. Joe W. I'm running a Quinn II, for the kickstand effect, adding a racker will only raise me up another 1/2in or so... I want to add mainly for the ease and speed of loading the gun... If I can get it to clear my thumb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecichlid Posted October 4, 2010 Author Share Posted October 4, 2010 My open gun doesn't have a racker on it yet... Mine doesn't either, I have given thought to adding one but I have just gotten used to racking it as needed without a racker. Granted the kickstand feature would be a nice additiion. Joe W. I'm running a Quinn II, for the kickstand effect, adding a racker will only raise me up another 1/2in or so... I want to add mainly for the ease and speed of loading the gun... If I can get it to clear my thumb I worry about a slide racker clearing my thumb too. One of my shooting buddies let me try his gun out and it was nice but it threw me off a bit trying to remember to always keep my thumb down. Joe W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve J Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Sitting fully in chair, hands behind head, fingers interlaced What is sitting fully? I would never ever say that. If the chair is supporting your body weight you're seated. That is how I would define fully. Others might say back against chair, BUT that is a common start position, so you can't infer that. FULLY means nothing. It's completely undefined and left to interpretation. Terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JThompson Posted October 17, 2010 Share Posted October 17, 2010 Sitting fully in chair, hands behind head, fingers interlaced What is sitting fully? I would never ever say that. If the chair is supporting your body weight you're seated. That is how I would define fully. Others might say back against chair, BUT that is a common start position, so you can't infer that. FULLY means nothing. It's completely undefined and left to interpretation. Terrible. There's a bunch of that in the new ones.... JT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCrane Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 (edited) Shot this 2 weeks ago: 34 points, 4.51 sec.. HF 7.5388 ClassifierCalc has it at 96.9270% CMCalc @ 83.7643% I hope USPSA even counts it towards my classifier, Im getting a TON better w/ the new gun.. and have some really good scores in the books for the next update.. Tanked 2 of my 4 used for my initial... A69605 Edited October 24, 2010 by BCrane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerTrace Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 I shot this one in October with a HF of 6.01 in Limited. The calculator estimated 84%. Unfortunately for me, USPSA figured it at 70%. Does that sound right to anyone else? I know the calculators aren't exact, but I wouldn't have thought it would be off by that much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justforfun Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 My HF was 5.141 in production. Calc put it at 82% and USPSA has it at 62%. Looks like they are a little off on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blaster113 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Shot this one in L10 Sunday, shitty slow slow slow cause of a make up shot on the steel. CMCalc.com says my shitty run was 71.16%, classifiercalc.com says 52.29%, which calculator is more accurate? I have a feeling its the lower%. Two of our resident M's shot in 4 seconds in Open; one with a 100% score and the other at 96% according to cmcalc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lugnut Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 See post 59 for the possible reason for the discrepancies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blaster113 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 seems like the cmcalc.com calculator wasn't updated with the new HHF. I guess the lower shitty score is accurate, oh well another score with a B next to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nm3gnr Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Shot this for the first time yesterday. Open 4.15 down zero 8.4337 hit factor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFlowers Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Shot this one today with a Revolver. Since its a 7 shot classifier, a reload from the table is required. Really drives the time up and the hit factor down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonovanM Posted June 12, 2011 Share Posted June 12, 2011 My HF was 5.141 in production. Calc put it at 82% and USPSA has it at 62%. Looks like they are a little off on this one. I shot it in 4.53 clean, Production. HF 7.72. Both calculators say 120%+, but based off this score it would be 92.7%. Thanks for getting my hopes up, USPSA. Goddamnit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robot Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 Shot this one today with a Revolver. Since its a 7 shot classifier, a reload from the table is required. Really drives the time up and the hit factor down. can't you shoot 6 and take the mike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carter300 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Production zero down, 6.06 sec, CMcalc says 93%, see what USPSA says... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztecdriver Posted June 27, 2011 Share Posted June 27, 2011 Production down 2, 6.05 classifiercalc.com says 87.98 - yeah, i'll be waiting as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexTalionis Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 Production 5.17s 31pts Both Calc's say 96%, but the numbers being posted here make 72% more likely :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carter300 Posted July 14, 2011 Share Posted July 14, 2011 Production zero down, 6.06 sec, CMcalc says 93%, see what USPSA says... USPSA says..........70%, WOW is CMcalc off on this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonovanM Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 My HF was 5.141 in production. Calc put it at 82% and USPSA has it at 62%. Looks like they are a little off on this one. I shot it in 4.53 clean, Production. HF 7.72. Both calculators say 120%+, but based off this score it would be 92.7%. Thanks for getting my hopes up, USPSA. Goddamnit! This was a 93.6% run. Hmph! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvipscshooter Posted July 31, 2011 Share Posted July 31, 2011 (edited) Open B Class 4.93 down 3 points for a 6.4908 HF Classifier calculator says its a 83.4528% run, classifiercalc.com CM Calc says its only a 72% run. Which is correct? Edited July 31, 2011 by lvipscshooter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagger10k Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 I shot this in production down 2 points in 4.61 today. Both sites say 100%. I guess I'll find out what it really is when my classifiers are updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwain C. Baer Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 I shot this in production down 2 points in 4.61 today. Both sites say 100%. I guess I'll find out what it really is when my classifiers are updated. That's smoking...great run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanky Posted September 19, 2011 Share Posted September 19, 2011 Shot this in Production yesterday. 4.99 with 35 points = 7.0140. Calc shows 100 but based on the posts in this thread, it looks like it will come out right at 85. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now