Rookie

Next you'll be trying to convince us that we (you) can do this with iron sights???

...Then you might want to sit down before you read the following... The 2023 Western States Single Stack Classic fielded 194 "Single Stack" competitors.

The "on-line" myth seems to be that accuracy is a function of bullet weight (at least in 223 or 5.56 world). I have barrels that shoot 55 grain FMJ very well (under 1 MOA) and I have used them successfully out to 600 yards (Steel with Flashers). My ballistic chart indicates that I'm pushing the super-sonic envelope at this range... but (obviously) the bullet is still moving. If I have a special shooting challenge where a heavier bullet might offer an advantage... heavy targets, 20 MPH winds, spinners, etc., then I might go to a heavier projectile. But if I just have to hit a target... I'll go with the lower cost option that gets the job done.

2022 & 2023 competitor counts by Division for the Area 2-Desert Classic... Limited, Open, & Carry Optics were all down 4-5% relative to 2022 to offset the 16% that competed in the new Limited Optics Division.

FYI... the current (per Practiscore) Division registrants for the 2023 A2 Desert Classic.

When my bolt (AR10 or AR15)won't fully close on an empty chamber, under spring force alone... I know that it is time to add lubricant to the bolt. Did you (USMC 1974) drop a round into the chamber of this rifle to confirm that it "plunked" as expected? You indicate that you tested the rounds in a case gauge, but it is not clear that you also tested them in the chamber.

If they change the word "only" in the WSB, to "roughly", then I could begin to see NROI side of the argument.

The question as originally posed used the word "only". The answer posted by NROI in the recent communication does not state this in the procedure used to make their argument. The phrase "...engage targets with only 2 rounds each..." is a reasonable indication that any shots fired in excess of 2 violates the written procedure! Therefore, there should be a procedural awarded. The only possible alternative is that somewhere in the USPSA rules there is a USPSA definition provided for the word "only" that I have not yet found.

We're a long way from MN and IL, but we have a rule set that has been around for a while, which allows a CO type handgun in our Stealth Division. I mention this because of the previous question regarding box dimensions. The dimensions and test criteria for the box can be found in the ruleset (if you are interested) that is included on our website: riomultigun.com. We were seeking a reasonable trade-off between optics versus iron sights on the handgun, and magazine capacity.

Why might you think that it is not legal?

Quarter Circle 10... 15,000 rounds, zero malfunctions, reasonably accurate.

The target that is the subject of this discussion clearly shows the scoring area of both targets. If the scoring perforation of the rear target was not exposed, as it is in this case, I suggest that we would not be debating a need for measuring tapes, magnifying glasses and global positioning equipment. How difficult is it to place one target over another without exposing perforations on the rear target?

I recently encountered problems with de-capping 9mm and pulled the problem cases to sort through at the end of my run. 4 of 5 of the reject cases carried the NORMA Headstamp. Further analysis showed that the flash hole was too small for the decapping pin to pass through.

Section 5.7 of the Multigun Rules (The USPSA version) reads much differently than the USPSA Competition Rules. I was unable to find (for example) a statement specifically tying any attempt to clear a squib to an almost instant DQ. Is a squib event that occurs during a Rifle, Shotgun or Multigun event inherently less risky?

Actually... the minimum distance, specified by USPSA (refer to Rule 2.1.3), for shotgun plates or poppers is 19'. Well under the 10 yards noted above. We use the minimum distance specified by USPSA for handgun (26') as the standard for shotgun birdshot minimum distance... and this is only if we can't reach a minimum of 10 yards due to bay limitations.

I knocked down 1 (of 5) poppers and 1 (of 6) plates on a plate rack with .22LR last Tuesday. Power Factor estimated at 41.

If you are getting a flare at the neck "...end of the case..." after sizing, then you have a very special problem. If the case will not fit the gauge immediately after sizing, then you need to make an adjustment or get a new die.

Fair question... I can confirm that it runs reliably and through approximately 2,000 rounds, has not suffered any failed or broken parts. If Daniele had indicated that she was looking for something to help her move to Master or GM Class and had $2,000 to spend on a firearm system, the basic Kel Tec PCC platform might not be optimal.

A friend of mine bought one, unfolded it, sighted it in and took it to one of our annual PCC matches (over 100 competitors). It had the plastic front sight (they have upgraded to metal in the last couple of years). He won the match with his $300 PCC. You can have fun with the Kel Tec.

You're a bit early mike.45, and we appreciate the enthusiasm. The Registration schedule has not been set... but will likely open in Mid-October. Details will be posted when available. The Match Dates have been reserved... Staff Match 17-18Mar2021 Main Match 19-21Mar2021

Relative to the Safety Area issue discussed above, what USPSA rule was/is violated by the local policies?

The criteria for Free World Irons requires that the weapon design predate "...3rd October 1990" (refer to Rule 5.3.1 below). I suggest that the M1 Garand satisfies this criteria. It would also fit into the Battle Rifle division. 5.3 Free World Irons 5.3.1 Any semi-auto rifle derived from a weapon designed in a NATO or Western Bloc nation before 3rd October 1990.

Could just be the way that I am reading the situation statement, but... my take is: The competitors argument (call FTE at ULASC) is not valid 2 Mikes on a target does not equal a Failure to Engage penalty Just because the RO is watching the gun, does not mean that he/she cannot observe the competitors failure to engage a target Was the RM called to join the debate? By the way... I have had FTE's called more than once at ULASC and before scoring was started, and subsequently the RO discovered hits on the suspect target.

Rondog... I use 2.7 grains of Titegroup with a 147 grain coated bullet to get a slightly higher PF as noted by Stealthy above. Loaded to 1.148 OAL, I get 980 fps with a 16" barrel. Stealthy used my "formula" as a basis for his test.

Or... you could simply require that the safety be applied during the entire course of fire.