Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

TRG65

Classifieds
  • Posts

    533
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    NoVA
  • Interests
    USPSA
    Long Range Rifle/Precision Rifle
    Aikido
    Hunting
  • Real Name
    Seth Ritzman

Recent Profile Visitors

965 profile views

TRG65's Achievements

Looks for Target

Looks for Target (4/11)

  1. I'll differ with the above comment that bolt throw is no big deal. For me it is a primary consideration, and for a few years I've only looked at <90 deg actions. I have several with 90 deg, both Rem and custom, mostly those are for other family members. They are a bit easier to unlock, however, I consistently mash my thumb on my switch view and more than once have ended up with a skinned knuckle on a 90 deg action. Either can be run very fast and the 90s tend to have a bit easier/smoother bolt lift, but the difference isn't enough to overcome the efficiency gained and, for me, the safety factor with the 60 deg actions. I have been looking at getting a new action and I've decided on the terminus. I like the Curtis too, and have seriously thought about buying an mpa production rifle that comes with the Curtis action.
  2. I use the vortex razor 85mm with the mrad reticle eye piece. I have RO'ed a fair number of PRS match over the last few years and it only once let me down on a very humid rainy warm day in NC. I was getting a lot of fogging, but so were most other scopes. I would like to have a Swaro but would have paid double and I'm not sure about the gain. In addition to the PRS and LR field matches where I've used it, I've used it for field hunting. I was able to count points in the last 10 minutes of shooting light to pick a buck for my son in a point restricted area. Could a better scope have done, better probably, but for what I need, it has done the job. At one match I RO'ed I used Swaro and vortex side by side, and several other version. Hands down the best glass was in the Hendersoldt. Under the light conditions that day, I could tell very little difference between the swaro and the vortex and I had a slight preference for the color hue of the vortex. I've looked through the Zeiss, Leica, Swaro, and vortex ranging binos, and there I could tell enough difference that I will wait and get the Zeiss or the Leica when the rangefinder I'm currently using gives up. My match and hunting rifle both wear Schmidt and Bender glass. I suppose you could see the mirage in some of the high power binos, but I prefer the spotting scope. Enough power for good mirage, but still wide enough field of view to spot shots. I also prefer the straight tube to the angled, the aiming just makes more sense to me.
  3. I agree that SH is ok and I check-out the new threads often just generally only read a few. Some of the best information is from local shooting FB groups. Here in VA there are 2, Mason Dixon and VPRC. When questions are posted there, the responses are usually informative and knowledgable, plus if you shoot with the groups, the quality of the shooter is known. I like the PRN YouTube videos. But at the end of the day it is best to have a few local good shooters to be able kick around the ideas, or who will let you shoot their equipment. Like Hoser/Tom Freeman letting me shoot his fancy AI 300WM at a Raton match.
  4. I rarely shoot paper for practice, almost all steel. But this weekend I had to rezero the venoms on my Cz accushadow 1 and my SP01 w/ cajun bushing with my new 147 load. I called it good when standing offhand both put 5/5 in the head A/C from 25 yds. The accushadow went 4As 1C and the SP01 went 3As 2Cs. Years ago I had a Les Baer 45 w/ the 1 1/2 at 50 guarantee, that gun was magic, it was just plain hard to miss. My CZs are good and a much better fit for the shooting I do, but they aren't magic like that gun was. At one time I also had a David Sams Elite II Beretta, that was a good gun, but I'll take the CZs as they feel better to me. The Elite II never impressed me as magic like the Les Baer did.
  5. I've had two slides milled for optics. Neither is perfect. One uses a plate and wasn't milled quite right so I had to shim the plate to get the optic to zero. The other was milled too low and the venom light sensor is buried in the slide, so I have to use manual adjust. Both were done by reputable CZ smiths, the one that is too low was a retrofit on a slide that had a target adjustable sight. I would 100% say buy the OR version, also if it is a standard plate, then you can shift plates if you decide to go from a vortex to a trijicon or whatever, instead of having the slide re-milled.
  6. I’ve used the udder and the gamechanger. I did a shoot off between the two and for me the udder shot better. Lots of folks love the Gc and the pint sized Gc, too
  7. Are you after the smallest group or the most consistent? If you look at Smithck’s chart the 2.330-2.350 aren’t the smallest but the groups look reasonable and more importantly the groups are impacting the same point. I’d call 2.330 my starting depth and then I probably wouldn’t have to change for the life of the barrel. Then I’d play with the charge a bit to see if things would tighten up a bit. when you resize could you try a small base die? That should put you back to factory dimensions. a screwed up chamber can definitely ruin a rifle, but if it shot 1/4 on one day you should be able to get a hand load to a consistent 1/2 to 3/4. I would look at some of the recent stuff on the precision rifle blog about seating depth for consistency, and look at stuff for ocw. I’m going to use ontargettds (to overlay shots and groups) for my next load development in conjunction with the satterlee velocity method to look for consistency. I hate redoing a load for a barrel, because usually it means I’ve lost confidence in it for some reason.
  8. I've had and have GAP, Crescent Custom, APA, and PVA rigs. I also have an RPR (up for sale currently). However, the RPR shoots as well as I can shoot. I have turned in great groups with it, just as I have my PVA Sako TRG, or my GAP full custom 7WSM. I got good groups from the factory 308 barrel, but the Hawk Hill/PVA barrels prefits shoot outstanding. You don't need a high dollar gun. My TRG and McM A5 stocked guns are more comfortable to shoot than the RPR. When I shoot the RPR, I have to think about it, when I shoot the Sako (but its not a full custom, but it is considerably more costly), I just lay down and shoot.
  9. I use my 650 for precision loading (hunting and PRS/NRL), and my 1050 for 9mm and 223. Based on your criteria, I'd probably say go with the 1100.
  10. My most recent 308 has liked H4895 better than Varget for accuracy.
  11. I have had a different experience than some of the others. I have two sets of Whidden dies, one was custom for 6.5 Addiction and the other is for 6.5 Creedmoor, both are outstanding. My experience with Forster has been just the opposite. I had a set of 6x223 dies that kept cracking seating stems, Forester's answer was to say don't use compressed loads. Using Whidden or Redding, I haven't had a problem, and have found that slightly compressed loads have usually been the best shooting loads. I will happy buy another Whidden or Redding set (in that order), but I won't buy another Forster.
  12. I use a Dillon 650 with whidden or Redding bushing dies in whidden floating case heads. I don’t use the Dillon powder dropper. My ES is usually around 20 and the SD 6-8. 3 shot group set usually average in the upper .3 or low .4 and 5 shot groups a tenth bigger. This is on multiple rifles and loads, and when the rifle still has a new barrel or at least hasn’t started deteriorating noticeably. I do get variation in my bump and seating depth. If I’d use a single stage, it would probably be less, but I did try on the RCBS JR that I was given for free, it gives bump and seating variations too. I’ll admit it isn’t the most solid single stage. I also use the expander in the seating die and don’t expand as a separate step. But my ammo isn’t holding me back from doing better at PRS matches, it is the fact that I don’t shoot live rounds for practice at distance. I do a little dry fire and shoot local matches, but I’ve can’t look around and “feel” what the right wind call is going to be that comes from lots of rounds being shot in practice at distances where the wind is a factor.
  13. This thread really got me thinking about building a 6mm or 6.5mm Grendel off of one of my AR platforms, but yesterday I managed to trade my one AR on an older GAP-10 6.5 Creedmoor. I didn't realize how much more there was to an AR10 than an AR15, and the GAP-10 is built focusing on precision so everything is extra heavy and stout. It weighs in at 11.5#, so with scope and bipod I'm guessing more like 15# give or take a 1/2 pound. I bet your Grendels are significantly more portable. I can't wait for some goodies to arrive and some work free time so I can get to the range.
  14. TRG65

    CO Weight Limit

    Maybe it's time for a new gun? My shadow (v1) and SP01 don't seem to be keeping up with the arms race.....wait but what does that say about my 20 year old G34s. It's no wonder I'm not shooting A class times/scores any more.... or was that the 6 year break. At least I can save on milling a slide when I have CGW mount a venom on my SP01 so my son and I don't have to keep swapping a CO gun at the end of stages.
×
×
  • Create New...