CClassForLife

Might not be a problem. I think some names for Practiscore competitor were having issues when they were 2 characters or less. L3950 for example.

People with first or last names that are 2 characters or shorter?

Brass threaded inserts for plastic. Drill holes where you want the optic to be. Use a soldering iron to set the inserts into drilled holes.

Carry Optics, 9/13/20, 29 years old PCC, 9/04/21, 30 years old

I'm assuming it's this stage.

At the very minimum, you get an FTSA for not activating the target. So you got scored the most lenient way possible. See 9.9.2 in combo with 9.9.3. Specifically, "Activated scoring targets which do not comply with the above criteria are considered disappearing targets and will not incur failure to shoot at or miss penalties, unless they are not activated (Rule 9.9.3 applies). Activated appearing scoring targets will always incur failure to shoot at and miss penalties if a competitor does not activate the target movement either before or with the last shot fired in a course of fire." In a funny turn of events, you got scored exactly how you intended. Although, it's -25 points not -5 as you calculated (-10 for miss, -10 for FTSA procedural for the disappearing target, -5 for potential hit). As for your question, let's say there's a long wall perpendicular to your view. Also, let's say that there's a target behind this wall. If you "shoot at" this target, you should get disqualified on the spot. What you did was so strange that it probably didn't compute in the moment, and they gave you the benefit of the doubt. Three possible results: -25 points (-10 miss, -10 FTSA for disappearing, -5 potential hit) -35 points (-10 miss, -10 FTSA for disappearing, -10 FTSA for steel, -5 potential hit) DQ

I think LO will absorb CO due to it being the more relaxed ruleset. 15 round production will probably never be a thing in USPSA because it will feel like too much of a loss. Time will tell.

LO will end up absorbing CO.

https://seboweapons.com/en/domu/443-tactical-sportsczechmate-magazine-catch-set.html I suggest you get all the things you need for the Czechmate and pay the postage from Czechia once.

3.8 grs if you're using coated bullets. 4.0 grs if using JHP. Gives ~130 PF through a 4.7" Sig AXG.

It costs me more to reload than buying rounds right now. However, I like to shoot JHP to prevent compensator fouling. This and being able to dial in my loads make it worth the ~5 cent per round premium. However, if all my guns were uncompensated, then I would just buy the cheapest CCI Blazer. Current breakdown of my minor loads at replacement cost: Brass - 5.8 cp (Blazer headstamp fully processed from A+ Brass) Powder - 3.0 cp (4.5 gr N340) Bullet - 9.5 cp (PD 124 gr JHP V2) Primer - 11.0 cp (CCI 500/550) Total of 28.3 cpr

If what you want is within your means, then get that. The thing you want already has a lead against everything else when it comes to the thing that actually matters (which is making you want to use the gun). My experience, expectations, and wants are different than yours. Personally, I would get the Saint because I already know how much better the other things shoot comparatively. However, they aren't that much better to justify the tradeoffs and/or cost. For you, that calculation might be completely different.

Do you mean hard leans to the right?

Springfield Saint Victor PCC is fantastic for <$1200. If I was getting my first PCC all over again, then that's what I would buy. Maintenance is easy as it's direct blowback and reliability should be better than its Glock counterparts due to the way the rounds feed. This is coming from a person who started with a JP GMR-15.

Shot one today. Very impressed. I don't think there's a better value for ~$1000. Factory furniture is fantastic, and the handguard doesn't have barrel nut tension bolts that normally protrude on the bottom of most handguards.