I mean let's be honest here, he hasn't been active in this thread except to criticize the quality of a product he doesn't even own. A response to @Douglee25's personal opinion doesn't necessitate what amounts to gatekeeping on current quality control of new versions of the same product. It's a tired repetition from someone who referred to their own products earlier in this same thread. That's not just a bad look on him, it's borderline intentional slight. I get the simple point about quality differences but the repetition is rather my point.
I would much rather own an MPA 2011, knowing that they have the ability to support their products long term with size and scale versus a small shop like Venom, Rafferty and others. We were quite speculative of MPA in the PRS market initially as well. Now their rifle chassis is the fourth most common in competition use. To your point the Limited Optic pistol is just a variation that MPA offers, the hybrid which would easily work as well can be had for $2799 on gunbroker. Having myself owned STI/Staccato, CK and Freedom Gunworks - yes it is true the "low end" of the competition market has shifted away from reasonably priced three years ago before inflation. That shouldn't surprise anyone, especially since the sticker price isn't what people are actually paying.