Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

shoots100

Classified
  • Content Count

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by shoots100


  1. 7 hours ago, Posvar said:

    I had to mess with all kinds of speed and angle variations on my RF100 and now it is 110% but a little slow. Sometimes there are two primers left when it times out. I can trust it now and don't have to watch it which is nice. I too am glad I cancelled my order for DAA and went with the Dillon. That being said there are guys out there with the DAA running well and I am sure they will continue to fine tune it, etc. 

    I got an RF100 after buying a 650 press many years ago.

    I did the recommended adjustments to it, like the PP, but never got it to run 100%.

    I moved on.

    SJC

     


  2. The same thing occurred with the debut of the RF100.

    I had one and I got tired of screwing with it.

    Sold it for a loss and that's the only piece of dillon reloading equipment I've ever gotten rid of.

    I couldn't live without my dillon presses.

    I tried all of the primer fillers, settled on the PAL and have been very happy with it.

    I would like to have another unit that fills tubes while I'm loading and if the PP can do that reliably(albeit slowly) without worrying about upside down primers, I'll give it a try. 

    Of course, I'll be waiting for some more positive reports on the PP before ordering, as I'm in no hurry because I have a Rolls Royce in the Garage !

     

    SJC

     


  3. 7 hours ago, Tampa-XD45 said:

    Which 22 ammo has "a more sensitive primed ammo combination" ?

    I used Fed auto match during match's and the fed 525 box ammo for practice and match shooting.

    The CCI patriot was also very reliable when I set the pull to 6.5 pounds.

    With the factory hammer, I needed to keep it at 7lbs with auto match and 7.5 with CCI.

    SJC


  4. 4 hours ago, AzShooter said:

    Sorry I can't.  I will be at the next Cactus Match Steel Challenge, the third Sunday at Ben Avery.  I'll be shooting my 617.  It has the new Apex Mass Drive Hammer which allows for single or double action shooting.  They just announced them at the Shot Show.

    617 Apex Mass Hammer.jpg

    I stand corrected, as Apex has answered the call about making an SA/DA mass hammer.

    SJC


  5. You need to blue loctite the strain screw of any revolver.

    If your not comfortable changing parts on your firearms, by all means bring them to a competent gunsmith, but it's really not that hard to accomplish by yourself, especially with all of the knowledge found in this forum.

    Trying to make a race car out of a VW beetle isn't going to happen using factory parts.

    The 617 has been around for awhile and there's only so much you can do to it before you need to add race parts to get where you want to go.

    As far as I know, there's no Single/Dbl mass hammer in production to make it fire more reliably.

    The only way I got my DA trigger pull down to around 6lbs, was with the addition of the apex mass hammer and a well adjusted main spring.

    I got it down to about 7 lbs DA pull with shimming the cylinder, longer firing pin, spring kit and a more sensitive primed ammo combination.

    Plus polishing the internals, frog lube and dry firing (with snap caps) for a couple of weeks.

     

    SJC

     

     


  6. Qualityguru,

    A little research in this forum would've show'd that almost all 929's needed work to make them function to a competitive standard.

    With some guidance from this forum, quality parts and some elbow grease, my 929 is rock solid and has been so for the last couple of years.

    Your not alone and we understand your frustration, but there is a light at the end of the tunnel.

    SJC

     

     


  7. 18 hours ago, MikeyScuba said:

    Shoots100, I tried nickel brass with the DAA moons.  Way, way too tight.  Up here most nickel brass is WIN headstamp.  I gave mine all away.

     

     

    I bought a couple thousand Federal nickel brass after trying all of the available nickel brass brands.

    The tighter fit of the brass in the moon clip and less space between the brass & frame = better ignition for me.

    Easier extracting nickel brass and they look nice and puurty after polishing.

    I do get the occasional split case every once and awhile, but its easy to find them when de-mooning.

    SJC 

     


  8. Been using the stainless .040" DAA moons for years. 

    After tuning my 929 to a 6lb DA pull, the DAA moons had the best ignition reliability of all the moons I tested.

    It figures it was the last moon brand tested and they come from a neighboring state.

    I only use nickle plated brass in my 929, but a fellow wheelgunner I lent a few moons to uses whatever he picks up and has had no issues either.

    As was mentioned, try different brands before going all in.

    SJC


  9. I've contacted all of these high end revolver manufacturers about making an 8 shot model, or an 8 shot 9mm or .38 cal cylinder conversion for competition use and haven't heard a peep back from any of them.

    Paying anything over $2k for a 6 shot revolver is just crazy in my book and yes I've shot Korth, Manurhin revolvers for comparison.

    It's like having a Ferrari and putting studded snow tires on it !

    If I'm gonna spend that type of money, I want to use it, not look at it !

     As was posted above, a S&W with a custom action + trigger job is on par and often exceeds most of the high end revolvers being made and for thousands + more less.

    If Korth offered an 8 shot convertible 9mm revolver, I would be on the waiting list, as the durability + user friendly adjust-ability are worth the extra $$ to me.

    Until them, I'll be using my blue collar 929's.

     

    SJC 

     


  10. N320.

    I used to get powder residue buildup under the extractor using other powders.

    Screwed me up at a match early last year.

    I switched to N320 soon afterwards.

    As a test, I didn't thoroughly clean my 929 for just under 2,000 rounds.

    Just cleaned around the front sight and cylinder exterior.

    Ran like a champ and I probably could've gone another thousand rounds without an issue.

     

    SJC

     


  11. Update.

    I called CZ and they told me that the P-09 kadet firing pin cross pin is held in place with a 2mm hex head set screw.

    I was able to remove the set screw, even though I gave it a good number of wacks with a punch, as I was told it was a roll pin that held the firing pin in place.

    Of course the new kadet firing pin & spring I ordered from CZ wasn't even close to the firing pin of the 09 kadet.

    I'm so glad that I took the initiative and called them to get the right pin and spring part numbers, instead of just ordering it off their site and receiving the wrong parts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    So as usual,  I had to do some work to the old firing pin.

    Initially,the firing pin was hardly sticking out of the slot when pushed in manually.

    The cross pin stops the over travel of the firing pin, so I carefully filed away the rear of the firing pin slot till the pin was just below the breech face when manually pushing it in.

    Now it works 100% with the CCI mini mag and any Federal ammo I use.

    Anyone need a firing pin & spring for a 75 kadet kit that won't fit a P-09 ?

    SJC


  12. I'm starting to get lite strikes when using my P-09 kadet kit.

    I received a new style kadet firing pin + spring from CZ.

    I read that a roll pin(near the rear sight) retains the firing pin, but can seem to get the roll pin to budge.

    I don't want to hit it any harder and risk breaking it.

    I also see that it has a firing pin retainer like the 75, but can't seem to be able to push the firing pin in enough to remove it that way either.

    Before I call CZ, can anyone please tell me how they replaced the firing pin on their P-09 kadet kit ?

    Thanks,

    SJC

     


  13. I started carrying a 329PD after a very close moose encounter and I hike a lot in bear country.

    While I liked it for it's lite weight, The 329 broke a few times when practicing with it and stung like a hive of hornets with full power loads, even with different grips.

    I'd rather shoot my 4" 500 single handed ! 

    I just couldn't depend on it, so it was sold for a big loss after getting it back from S&W.

    I ended up buying a Taurus 444ULT.

    After beating the crap out of it and suffering no failures, I bought another one and don't worry about reloading , as I carry them both in a double shoulder rig now.

    While I've never shot them in a comp(Don't have enough loaders or a proper holster), I've shot them both at steel practices with friends, using 44 spcl 200 grn coated loads.

    While it has and can be done, I wouldn't want to shoot a match with the 329 and 44 mag loads.

    That would make me think twice at getting into the revolver game.

     

    SJC

     

    IMG_1157.JPG


  14. 12 hours ago, UpYoursPal said:

    The Ghost Ultimate holster for revolvers works very well, and can be adjusted to work with multiple revolver types.   I can use it for my N-frame 327, and with a simple screwdriver adjust it to work with my S&W 500!  It's pretty great.

    Ghost for me too.

    My 929 draw's quick & clean and is secure when locked.

    Offered in left hand too.

    SJC


  15. I had some of the same brass issues as others with my 929.

    Misfires, 20% chamber fit failure and tight extraction.

    To stop all of the BS, I've been using nickel plated brass and CED .040" moonclips.

    I get about 10 reloads before the brass starts to have some failures.

    Now I enjoy shooting my 929, instead of complaining about it.

     

    SJC 


  16. I've always preferred shooting, carrying and working on revolvers, so it just seemed natural to shoot them in competition.

    Thankfully some revolver manufacturers decided to make eight shot models to keep the sport going.

     I do appreciate a fine crafted bottom feeder, but I just don't get that warm and tingly feeling shooting them.

     

    SJC  

     

     

     


  17. I tested a C-more with an 8 moa dot and liked that size for steel plate shooting.

    I'm in the process of setting up a 617 for RFPO.

    As my depleted 2018 shooting funds didn't allow for a C-more purchase, I did find a good price for a new Fast Fire 3.

    I also ordered a raptor engineering mount after reading up on them from past posts here, and will hopefully have it set up next week.

    SJC  

     


  18. That looks good, but I've seen pics of other 617 cylinders with a lot more metal removed.

    I don't know how those cylinders held up to a lot of use though ?

    Did you weigh the cylinder before and after machining it  ?

    I'm not expecting miracles, but I know a lighter cylinder takes less poundage to move and speed is the name of the game.

    SJC

×
×
  • Create New...