rustychev
-
Posts
396 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Profiles
Events
Store
Posts posted by rustychev
-
-
I went with a glock 34 and left if stock. I carry a 19mos with a rmr 07 at work and off duty so I wanted to keep the same platform and have been very happy.
-
Quote
I use a water proof mattress cover for a crib. works great has elastic to hold it on and best of all cheep.
-
I have used to tite group or 320 but have found e3 to be very clean.
-
I just went for SS to CO after locap nats and am just now starting to get back to where I feel I should be. Part of that is going to glock for CO but also its a different game with 20+ rounds in the gun vs 10 I had in SS minor.
-
Im running E3 as well 3.7 under a 125 blue dont remember the OAL off the top of my head but PF has been 137-139 at my last 4 or 5 majors out of a 5" 1911 or glock 34.
-
I know you asked about a SRO but I sent in a Romeo 3 max they got it on a Friday and had the new one on the way by Tuesday. I dont think they fix them I think its a in stock thing meaning if its in stock it will be fast if not good luck.
-
Just switched to CO after lowcap and put romeo 3 maxes on glock 34s one gun is going good at about 2k the other one stopped holding zero after 200 rounds and is on the way back to sig today.
-
Iv got a Romeo 3 Max going to fedex today for not holding Zero left right wont hold and is drifting left with every shot. Its all mush when ajusting left right not clicks so we will see.
-
I have all gens of mags and all needed to be just touched on the corner to fit.
-
Sent one in on a 34 gen 5 12-4-20 nothing yet
-
I saw that as well. I don't think it really matters until the stage is on the ground.
-
Im more interested in peoples experience with how they are holding up vs the SRO as that seams to be the standout for long term survival.
-
I have never looked thru a sig 6 moa but have looked thru a 2.5 and 5.0 sro. Im not dead set on the 3 moa but do like the smaller dot.
-
I am shooting Single stack thru Area 3 this year then planing to jump over to CO and will be using glock 34 gen 5. I have narrowed it down to the sro 2.5 moa or romeo 3 max 3 moa.
How is the sig holding up. I have yet to see someone break at SRO locally. No one that I know is shooting a sig. I can also get my hands on the sig and the SRO is sold out.
-
1 hour ago, ima45dv8 said:
Thanks for taking a minute, Mac. I've noticed Jodi hanging out recently, and hoped it might get your attention, too.
Don't be a stranger around here.
==================
Robert,
I can tell you that I helped produce six successful Area 6 matches that were so good because the MD managed it thoroughly and had pulled together a great staff. Any of y'all who remember Cindy's matches know how good she was (still is, at GSSF). AND, one year after a number of reviews of the match book by several people (yeah, I was one of them
), we published a match booklet with the exact same error in it. A copy-and-paste from a Nationals matchbook from 1-2 years before had that same restrictive verbiage in it. . .and we missed it. It didn't happen twice.
Now that the explanation and timeline for correcting it has been shared, we can pile on or move on.
I have no problem with the explanation it happens been there done that sent the email company wide with the typo.
The problem I have is the third part of Troys response.
1 hour ago, ima45dv8 said:I'd also like to point out that we have at least a half-dozen methods of getting in touch with someone in admin in USPSA and asking about things like this, rather than assuming something nefarious is going on, and making baseless accusations and assumptions. Nice job.
Last time I emailed HQ it took 2 days to get a response when I sent it during the work week. So implying I should call HQ on Saturday morning is disingenuous at best. Also saying I was making assumptions about nefarious goings on and flat out saying I was making baseless accusations when the question was based on the match book put out by HQ is rude at best and and a personal attack at worst when viewed with the "Nice job" he added at the end.
Having said all that and after rereading what I have said before here I am going to try and edit my second post here to say I was wrong about the "Do as we say not as we do" comment as the explanation given is very reasonable and I was wrong with that comment.
-
26 minutes ago, mactiger said:
Just to clear things up: the match book has a couple of errors in it that we are aware of, and it will be corrected after this weekend, mostly due to the people who produce it being off for the weekend. The "range is closed" is not correct, and was probably cut and pasted from an old match by someone in the production of the book. I pointed it out yesterday, but it didn't get fixed before the book was published.
The range will be open on the morning that staff begins shooting, Wednesday, May 5th. We will not be violating any rules, regardless if nobody shows up other than staff on Wednesday morning.
I'd also like to point out that we have at least a half-dozen methods of getting in touch with someone in admin in USPSA and asking about things like this, rather than assuming something nefarious is going on, and making baseless accusations and assumptions. Nice job.
I don't think I ever said or implied you would be breaking rules (other than perhaps the 6.5.2) Witch you have now explained. I will also say the implication that I assumed something nefarious is going on is a stretch to say the least. I also most certainly did not make any accusations that are not based totally on what the ORG published.
So well I could have taken a more discrete path in asking perhaps you should not be so sensitive when the ORG failed to proof read before publishing.
-
The truth is it really won't matter to me as the earliest I would get there is 1200 on Thursday and by the time I do the safety video and register. It will be after 1. It's more the point that they tell us to go by the rule book.
Also I see they say fill out the equipment survey before arrival. Do they send it out or do I need to get it someplace?
-
Just remember when we hold our local matches we need to make sure we're following the rule book. A fine example of do as I say not as I do I guess
Edit After Troys response I was wrong here and it was just a typo. Been there done that myself.
-
After looking at the match book for Low cap nats this year are they not violating 6.5.2 based on the range being closed to competitors for the first day of staff and the first half of the second day. Maybe Im reading it wrong but it looks like the range is closed to competitors until 1PM on Thursday.
-
-
Can anyone tell me what the colored numbers mean.
-
We have a club 30 miles away putting on a RO class I told all my guys you take it and pass the test our club will cut you a check for the cost of the class. The class is in less than a month and only 4 people that I know of from my club have signed up. This is why I never put one on lots of big talk about taking the class until its time to take it.
-
-
2021 Great Plains Section Championship
Match starts: July 17, 2021 @ 8:00 AM · Match ends: July 18, 2021 @ 5:00 PM
Location:
48298 US-18
Canton, SD 57013
Hosted by Sioux River Sportsmen's Club
July 17-18, 2021
Staff match Saturday July 17
Main match Sunday July 18
10 Stages - Approximately 225 rounds
Match fee $100 - Lunch included
https://practiscore.com/2021-great-plains-section-championship/register
), we published a match booklet with the exact same error in it. A copy-and-paste from a Nationals matchbook from 1-2 years before had that same restrictive verbiage in it. . .and we missed it. It didn't happen twice.
Night matches
in General Match Issues
Posted
Here is video of one we did this spring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQhujrCSQ_c