KAYZER

During the first lockdown (I'm in Europe, we had a few depending on country) I commited to "daily- semi daily" dryfire and decided I would seriously try the both eyes thing. I shoot singlestack an noticed I was slowing down more than needed for the intended shot. Stayed at it for about 2 months. I still get a ghostly image of my irons but I shoot with both eyes open, all distances, except for a very tight shot. My time to first shot has improved and I even got to shoot full target focus on easy to intermediate targets. I has really been my breakthrough since competing for 5 years. I really depends on where you are at shooting wise. It is a nice to have, but I would say fundamentals are way more important than this stuff.

Man that dude sounds like a tinkerer. . Yeah, I use light mainsprings, and light recoils. And prefer a snappy cycle, which seems more predictable for me than the dampened cycle form let's say a 147. The net effect is slide velocity and you do want to do what you can to lessen the impact on the frame. The side effect of "stroking" the slide is a nice bonus but not the intended goal.

aah..no.. Standard 1911, for sure. All min eupgrades and changes have been 100 standard 1911. great stuff!

BUL

2ct's Unless your are nationally competitive or plan to shoot IPSC - it's about the same. As far as i've seen most USPA is just clusters of shots. Thing is when stages become more technical and more steel is in the game, that extra rounds are really handy. I shoot aboput 95% of available point in ipsc matches, I take that extra rounds. For example: you can drive down a activator with 2X 9MM and still have enough rounds for that swinger to shoot 3X.

Latest video of the Bravo Built (9 pound recoil, 15 mainspring) Reset and Ignition

Don't be. That is what this thread is about! I run thick buffers on my 9 mils. I believe they are from Ghost, they basically de-stroke the slide but my slide-stop can still engage and I can still rack the slide for failures and unloaded starts. Never had any issues running buffers, but check them EVERY TIME I clean. -EDIT- It just came to my attention that you also questioned the reliability. In my opinion: we are running a platform not designed for the caliber. It would make way more sense to run the 1911 in 38 super (COAL and case shape). Basically the 9MM needs to be tuned to run reliable. A buffer is as said de-stroking the gun and makes the slide essentially travel less. This also makes it so that the recoil spring is less compressed and the forward momentum is impacted. If you have any reliability issues, I would strongly suggest to skip the buffer, use OEM springs (at least 10 pounds) and check mags and ammo. It is more likely that the buffer is worsening a deeper rooted issue.

Update on the Alpha build - "beater gun" (Aprox. 8K rounds) Parts Trigger: Gepperth medium flat Ignition: Extreme engineering / 15 pound main - 800 grams (1.75 pounds) pull weight - 2MM pre-travel / hardwall / 800-850 grams break/ hard spring reset of 3MM Cilinder and Slide sear leaf spring EGW HD Long Ejector - relieved for Dawson magazine tubes Ed brown extended mag release Bul shielded safeties (MIM) Brass RC TECH magwell Armavov Ergogrips EGW HD slidestop .200" Fixed ejector issue (MIM) to EGW long and relieved for tubes (dawson magazines Updated grip safety and MSH to a black variant for looks Has been running flawlessly for many 1000's of rounds. Lock-up is solid, Black finish is wearing. Had some issues on lockup and non-lockback. Changed out the Bul armory slide stop which was wearing some flats for an EGW tool-steel option. Great options as is has the indent for assembly. Wear pattern and contact on the barrel under lugs seems very equal, fir with the .200 slide stop is very solid It will be this configuration for the foreseeable future (next 5K)

For the Alpha I picked a black version from BUL, just a "Two tone is the best tone reason" For the Bravo I kept the Stainless look. The GS are contoured nicely and high. I like the bump on the back and see no real need to switch them out. The are MIM and my competition guns are pinned anyway. I did switched them out for an all steel Ed Brown and noticed no difference other than the blending that needed to be done.

For me, the difference is in the options. AFAIK the frames are the same (which makes sense for a production house) - Government - fixed sights (looks like ledge style is now standard) black still uses the Oxide coating (rub off) - EDC - fixed sights (looks like ledge style is now standard) Lightrail + PVD coating + upgraded parts like hammer? I believe for competition only below is really interesting - Trophy - Bowmar style rear blade + extended controls - magwell - Racer - above + large magwel + grips / SAW serrations / modular trigger (is not available in 45 ACP?) For me I need a bowmar blacked-out rear blade and a narrow fibre front sight. I you plan on upgrading your gun with a different trigger and magwell I would make sense to spring for the racer. Unfortunately it is only available now in stainless. Perhaps Bull has come to the insight that only PVD coating really works on stainless. A back oxide finish is not durable. I would be really nice if they offer the PVD coating on the racer, that would make sense! It looks like BUL is really maturing as a production house. Offering less options and the options they do offer, make sense. I do no longer see the TIN barrels as an option (which is surprising) and the trigger parts looks like the upgraded parts from a year or-so ago. Then marketed as "R-line" I do not think these are made in-hose but rather sourced for Extreme engineering. And if these are made in-house, good on you BUL! The dimensions and fit and finish are on par with the best.

That is correct! See point 18 that shaping of the slide is allowed, weapons that have slide cuts/windows are rejected. A good example is the SW performance centre with the see trough cuts.

Thanks, more is coming on the "custom built" Keep in mind that the slide serrations are the only thing that makes a trophy SAW. They are grippy and the look bad ass IMO. ooh the magwells I have owned... Dawson IPSC - good magwell for keeping the 1911 looks. The MSH is aluminum and I prefer steel Standard BUL - Open front (smith and Alexander style) Even more classic and the work just fine. Steel M-Arms - Modern looking Alumnium multi-axle CNC product. Great fit on the frame, very solid option! (grips need to be cut down) Bul Armory - Big magwell ( current on Bravo build) Best clean looking magwell, reminds me of a SVI option (grips need to be cut down) Brass RC TECH - Huge ugly magwell. I do like the lip on the front which gives support on my weakside pinky. Recoil seems to be affected. (current on Alpha built)

They are available in traditional bushings, I can imagine more so in the US.

Thanks for your input, good to know I am not blabbering into a vacuum. I will be updating this post also on build Bravo and the experiences along the way. But for now they do seem decent built and a good platform to start off on.

Alpha: 1280 grams - 45.15 ounces Bravo: 1194 grams - 42.11 ounces Keep in mind that these are Bulbarrel optioned guns. I don't really think they provide a real advantage over bushing guns. In fact a bushing gun is more centre balanced. The BUL Armory do seem to be more available in Europe in Bullbarrel and it does look slick. I do prefer running 1 pound lighter recoil due to the guns being more front weighted.