Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Dutycalls75

Classified
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dutycalls75

  • Birthday 04/20/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Lansing, MI
  • Real Name
    Jason Lachowski

Recent Profile Visitors

771 profile views

Dutycalls75's Achievements

Looks for Match

Looks for Match (2/11)

  1. In the beginning when CO was a provisional division having an optic wasn’t a requirement to shoot CO, but that was also when it was still mag capacity limited to 10 and had a weight limit. I’m pretty sure though that some production GM came into a major match and won CO with his production gun and then afterward HQ added the addition rule that you had to have an optic. (I was told that they thought it violated the spirit of the rules and they were worried it would cause problems down the road if not corrected.)
  2. For anyone that’s interested, there is a small shop out west, called Trinity Nevada, that is making traditional island/ribbed barrels again as well as a more modern design comp design. Here is they’re Facebook page: https://m.facebook.com/trinitynv/
  3. Stuart, What are the chances that a long slide version of the P10 comes out?
  4. Dutycalls75

    New CZC Gun

    The P09 mags have better capacity compared to the SP01. Using the P09 mags would let this pistol be able to swap to 40 and not be at a capacity disadvantage like the SP01.
  5. As Stuart quoted from the rules you can swap out any minor part with an aftermarket one. Thumb safeties are explicitly mentioned as a minor part. Something to keep in mind is that the gun still has to fit the box. I would test any part your looking to push the limits with in the box before heading to major match to ensure your complying with the rules..
  6. +1 on this. Well other than the limited minor 10 part. All we need is Open Major, Open Minor, Limited Major, and Limited Minor.
  7. I did the same thing in a Shadow 1 loser and have had no problems.
  8. I’m thinking about getting into carry optics and I’m looking at different optics. Does anybody have any experience with the Shield RMS?
  9. I use a set of Merrel hiking shoes, but just saw that they released the MQM flex with gor-tex. Looks like it might be a good alternative to the Solomons and Inov-8s
  10. This will be your best bet: Its uses a Trijicon mounting plate made for 1911s, that has the rear buis built into it. CZCustom can machine it for you and I think Primary Machine just started doing it as well.
  11. Looks cool. I’m not sure though I would consider the closed top an advanatge, but more options in the market is always good.
  12. If you take your magwell off, yes you should be good. As long as you don’t have any frame weights or any milling done to the slide. The only change I’m going to make is to take the magwell off my G35 I built for limited and run it occasionally in Production. My G35 is a gen 3 with a double undercut, finger grooves removed, SC grip job, zev trigger, pins, extended mag release and sights. my only concern is if I will have to take the basepad extensions off, I’m not sure if they will fit the box.
  13. Zommbbie threaded.......bash it in the head!!!!!! In all seriousness though, from the IDPA rulebook: 8.2.1.3 Excluded modifications for SSP D. Add-on magazine week opening 8.2.2.2 ESP permitted Features and Modifications W. Modification of the magazine well and add-on well extensions So yes any magwell, even a small “carry” one is prohibited in SSP but is legal in ESP.
  14. Seeing as CZCustom is a forum sponsor I would go with them.
  15. Tungston would be a pain to machine. There is a company that announced a All steel glock frame but it’s like $2,500, so that’s a no for me. The Gun Collective has a video on the Genesis and that’s gunna be like $1,250. The only one that looks viable from my standpoint is the Alpha Foxtrott frame that is part steel and part aluminum.
×
×
  • Create New...