IHAVEGAS

Not sure that question is being addressed. When I have the timer my opinion/philosophy/etc does not mean dee diddly squat - any call needs to be justifiable by opening the rule book. Even in the shooting sports we use common sense when we have to

My first XD is a 40 cal 4", it might be the last pistol I would sell. That gun came with a test target in the box just like CZ's do. I was so happy with the 4" that I ended up getting a later manufacture 5" in 40 and 9 and eventually an Xdm 9 when the 5" XDs disappointed. Only the first XD came with the test target and only the first XD was anything special or what I would consider accurate enough to make me happy for IDPA and USPSA (40 loaded to 145 pf is just fun), so I've wondered if manufacturing tolerances or other aspects of quality control have cheapened over time. My Xdm 9 still shows up at matches in another shooters hands (he is either production M or GM now) and he beats me like a red headed step child. Great gun, if I was smarter I would have never moved on from it. IDPA changed their rules making the 4" XD illegal for CCP division (0.25" too tall - Glock was where the money was), so I quit paying IDPA dues.

That it doesn't take a $1500 TSO or the like for a shooter to make it to GM or belong on the super squad (ref. Bob Vogel for example) . Some of the everyday shooter priced plastic fantastics are flat out great guns.

Good point. The person with me when I had mine has had a lot of fun with it since she figured out that I didn't remember squat about what I did afterwards. They really could insert an alien anal probe and you would not know the difference.

Agreed, but the Glock and XDM crowd might see the CZ as overkill if all you want to do is win matches.

I really like Tanfo's when they are right, but I have purchased 2 that do not shoot worth a darn and they are notorious (ask Patriot Defense or any outfit that makes parts for them) for lack of quality control. When that happens do not expect much from IFG. Where I have gotten is to look for a used one that works well from a trusted seller.

Don't know how much it would matter, but when I was thinking of cutting brass another poster pointed out that 10mm is tapered. 40 for reference

Not arguing, but I have seen a lot of guidance suggesting that you work on trigger control by trying to get the mechanics right while pulling the trigger rather than outmuscling the gun.

At a level 2+ you have the luxury of positioning 3 people to watch the shooting, the running to weak side 180 break should be called correctly. When there is just 1 r.o. and the other person is scoring ahead things get dicey. New r.o's tend to get nervous when they see a person is going to reload while moving to their weak side and the r.o.'s are usually positioned on the strong side so that they sort of have to look through your back to see the gun. I used to cock my strong hand wrist toward my strong side to avoid the 180 break but dropped that habit when I got dq'd by an r.o. who imagined how I had my wrist oriented and called the dq through my back with his x-ray vision - I've seen about the same thing happen to others on two or three occasions - beware the new r.o. on a learning curve. When running a shooter I personally can't call a 181-190 break in real time with sufficient certainty to dq anybody. Past a certain point, say 200, they get easy to call even when everyone is moving and when the stage is not oriented square to the 180. The best r.o. advice I've received on 180 calls is "you will know it when it happens", in other words the stuff that is not ticky tack is easy to see. The best shooter advice I've been given is "don't let the r.o. make a mistake" , in other words make it very obvious where the gun is pointed when doing something that makes new r.o.'s nervous. And yea, dqing people really sucks.

Given how high it is priced my solution was to buy enough factory ammo to make it through a match, use that brass forever on an as needed basis but otherwise shoot 40.

I have never been able to duplicate the issues some guns seem to have if they are not held tight, got curious one day and set up a test where the gun was fired (Sig 9mm in this case) without any grip pressure whatsoever and still couldn't force a ftf. At matches I also do not see folks getting ftf's on the weak hand or strong hand only classifiers. Not picking on anybody or any gun, I just can't duplicate this often mentioned issue with my guns and if I could I think I would have to modify the gun so it would be reliable when fired weak hand only - maybe less slide spring weight?

Have been shooting Ruger's version of your gun (10mm match champion) loaded to just above 155 power factor 40 with moon clips in IDPA a little bit this year. You would have to get the 4" gun to be legal. It is neat to be able to run 10's if you can't find small primers and otherwise just fun to shoot. If you sneak in a hot 10mm once in a while it keeps local match s.o.'s on their toes.

Assuming they were willing, I would probably try and find a reasonable cost hotel near the hospital and arrange for them to call me a cab to get me to my room after the procedure. If that didn't work I would advertise locally for a kid with a drivers license who wanted to make an easy buck. Good luck - may be in your shoes soon.

Don't get me started . . . .

When in doubt, never get the gm's on your squad involved .

After I took the r.o. training hq went the opposite way with a couple questions I had asked than my instructor did, and when we reviewed the discrepancy he explained to me that those of us on the bottom of the food chain need to follow the written text but what hq says goes. I've also witnessed a rather long discussion regarding number of procedurals between the president/Troy/the RM where it seemed things were unclear enough even to those folks to allow various interpretations. Where I have gotten to over time is that there is right according to the text and then there is right according to the question right ups and only sometimes do both agree. In fairness some of this has gotten cleaned up over time.

My revolver smith (Bosshoss are you out there?) who is well known for tuning S&W explained to me that he had once tried to develop a solid pin solution for his customers who are not gentle reloaders. What he found was that there was no right length that would work, each pin had to be adjusted in length for each particular gun, I assume that is why S&W stuck us with this Achilles heel in the first place, making it rugged takes a bit of fiddling. I copied what ysrracer did, so far so good.

If memory serves the redesigned "unbreakable" TK custom pin did not come out until this year - have no idea if that will be a game changer but for now I am pretending like it is indeed unbreakable and on the rare occasions I am in the mood to dry fire just not worrying about it.

That is the only downside I could find. For a US shooter you can buy something like an STI Eagle & shoot IDPA esp + steels + USPSA limited major which was very nice. Buying a carry / self defense / range toy / hunting 10mm and downloading to 40 for plinking and competition is handy too.

You can surprise 9mm shooters with how soft 40 shoots at about 140 - 145 or so power factor. It is also really nice to have the extra oomph on steels, particularly on otherwise slow activators. If they ever change production to 15 rounds in mags that could put you at a disadvantage (seems like most 40 mags are 14 max).

Wondering if the redesigned TK Custom "unbreakable" firing pins, and changing the spring as preventative maintenance makes that issue disapear? If they fixed that and the weak arsed crane retaining set up, and factory repairs were fast and friendly like Ruger, I might become a fan boy instead of a fence rider.

I am 99% decided that my 929 won the comparison test, send me a pm if you want 9mm used.

I am sorry you did not understand the original response. I was using the word "you" as described in item #2 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/you .

Mea Culpa, I thought I remembered that you had gone to the dark side. Thank you for the correction.

Per the rule book, if your club does not have "a supply of ammunition and one or more firearms to be used as official calibration tools", is just giving a reshoot on all calibration challenges the right thing to do? Last time I had an edge hit that didn't fall at a local that is the reasoning that was used. 'We can't calibrate it the way you are supposed to so we can't say it was correctly calibrated'