Haraise

Well of course it depends on the match and distance, that's why I put the kind of match and specifics in the original post. Hoser stage followed by long tight shots.

What are you thinking, straight .725?

Still .5 MOA after long strings? This is a lot lighter (looks like about .625 everywhere but the gas block?) than the straight .750 stretch 16.

Looking for the least front heavy/overall weight barrel that can still make long fine shots after a long stage. Straight .625? .750 into .625? .650 into .750 like JP's lightweight?

Not just new steel. Better bolt designs as well.

Ah, just like that saying. Ounces equal pounds and pounds equal nothing to be concerned about. Anyone have a weight on just the nordic tubes? Lancer has their weights listed.

Anyone weigh the difference between nordic and lancer (cf) extensions?

Yeah, a lot less. That whole less than a tenth of a percentage increase per inch. You're way overstating the case. The 6.5 Grendel is happier in barrels shorter than 5.56. Long for a 5.56? Very long for a 6.5G.

On the other side, the 6.5 is far more short barrel friendly than a 5.56. If I were to get one, 16-18" is the most I'd do. After 19.5 (per AA's charts), you're only gaining .086% per inch in velocity.

Lancer posts up their weights, and I'd like to compare them to Nordic, but can't find any info. Anyone have a source?

Any plan for the CTS LS-P to go Accubushing?

I can't help but hear this in the tone of an IRS auditor. "How could you possibly NOT know about section 10 subsection 2 subsection 8 subsection 3!"

You really think the box feds and x rails are worse than the two yard long pole vaults people use in Tactical?

So there's no benefit to .40 aside from brass/loading commonality?

Weird, so people are going down in bullet weight to make the gun more snappy... what weight are people shooting at? 155?

TTI is a 1349$ package... if you can point out where to get M2s for 500$ I'm all ears!

Other than the massive fail jam of the 1301, why wasn't it liked? The long forend, the slimness, the shorter stock, the lightness, gas operation... the one I felt (not fired) seemed perfect for me. Was the M2 better at recoil than the 1301, even with slugs?

I've seen purple color fill in those two lines work pretty well, here.

What do you think the A5 has over the M2? Is the autoload so much better than dropping in the chamber? Anything else?

98 page thread all about the M3000. They are good enough to help me earn a 2nd overall Limited at the 2015 USPSA Multigun Nationals. http://www.brianenos.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=173219&page=1 Yeah, I've read about 30 pages of it, and didn't see why it's actually better than an M2... I was hoping I missed something, but it looks like a knockoff that's 90% as good as an M2 and that's about it.

So what's the good about the M3000? I'd always heard it disregarded as for people who can't afford an M2.

Thank you. I really appreciate you putting in the effort to try and make things better for everyone. It's worthy of respect, Mr. Byrd.

I never ever ever want to go back to the public range there. Ever. I was sweeping up brass and a guy started screaming at me on a microphone... I wanted to cry and left, never want to go back. Started shooting in the desert instead. I only came back to train with Ms. Keehart privately... she made the experience so much better, as did Ms. Leatham. I wasn't screamed at for a stupid reason or publicly embarrassed at all. Now I want to keep going back to matches. But never Ever The public range and those ROs.

What're the dimensions on it?

Yep, just went last week myself. It was a great time... a bit slow and geared for 'so this is your first time shooting' but still had a good time running the stages.