I understand the appeal process but they used the the testimony of shooters behind the stage line rather than the testimony of the SO standing right over the shooter. It's plain favoritism. Ask the other shooters disqualified on this same stage.
Correct. In their infinite wisdom the "panel" decided two spectators behind the stage line were in a better position to make the call than the SO and Scorekeeper who were standing right there. Nothing but blatant favoritism.
When he came back and shot that stage which was his last of the match, he dropped 9 points, had a procedural and almost lost the match to Shane Coley who by the way should be REALLY pissed.