Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

ntphd

Classified
  • Posts

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Abilene, TX
  • Real Name
    John Miller

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

ntphd's Achievements

Looks for Range

Looks for Range (1/11)

  1. Hey folks, thanks so much for the great information! I should have mentioned gun type, but truth is I haven't decided. Maybe a 1911 (commander) or a CZ P-01. Some of you already addressed the 1911. I also should have been specific about carrying circumstances. Although I realize this will make the purists cringe . . . The reason I'm interested in the clip-style iwbs is that I would like to be able to look out of my car window, decide "yeah, I should go ahead and carry here," and then slip it and clip it. I'll check out your suggestions. If anyone else wants to add to the list, all thoughts are welcome. Thanks again.
  2. Okay, I realize this question is a bit off-topic (i.e., it's not about competitive shooting). Nevertheless, I'm guessing a lot of folks on this forum have experience with concealed carry. I have a concealed carry license, but do not carry regularly. I'd like an iwb holster that I can simply clip on when I need to carry. Anyone have any experience this sort of product? (http://www.falcoholsters.com/eshop/gun-holsters/iwb-concealment-holsters/leather-holsters/93-iwb-concealed-leather-gun-holster-with-steel-clip-it-20s.html) It looks like it would be great for convenience. I just wonder about stability. I wonder whether that one, convenient clip would allow the holster to move around too much when trying to draw. Any input/experience shared will be appreciated. Thanks.
  3. I absolutely love my Shadow, and now I've started looking around for a compact. Any thoughts on the P-01 and/or P-02? Sounds like a reliable carry gun, which is essential for me. (The Shadow compact looks fantastic, but it is a couple hundred out of my price range.) Is the stock trigger long and heavy like the stock SP-01? Is it just as easy to lighten by switching hammer springs as it is for an SP-01 Shadow? The CZCustom site describes the P-02 (which I can't find on the CZUSA site) as having an "omega" trigger. Any comments on this trigger system? Thanks in advance. John
  4. That is because it doesn't really matter what ammo or projectile you use, as long as you don't change it. By the time you are fiddling with fixed sight heights you have usually settled on a load or ammo type and will generally stick with that or ensure any other loads you use have the same POI. Changing loads with fixed sights is an exercise in frustration. Find a load and stick to it. Hope this helps. Okay, perhaps I misunderstood the op. Sounded like his POI was two inches low with the old sights, and still two inches low with the new sights. Doesn't seem like load consistency has anything to do with it. I guess I should phrase the question this way: have you tried other bullet shapes and weights, and do you get the same results?
  5. My Shadow was POA=POI with wwb. When I started shooting my reloads (147 Montana Golds [with VV N320]), they didn't shoot high or low (which is what folks told me would happen). In my case, they consistently shot 2 inches to the left. I ran a thread and mostly got back a bunch of question marks. Finally, someone mentioned that the ogive (sp?) of the 147 is so different from the 115 that this sort of result is possible. I guess I was very fortunate; it's a lot easier to loosen the rear sight and move it than it is to change out the front sight. With that minor adjustment, I'm back to POA = POI.
  6. I may be completely off-base here, and given the technical information in the op (way beyond me), I probably am. Still, no one in this thread has asked about ammunition and what type of bullet you are using. I raise the point only because my Shadow shot very accurately with wwb. When I switched over to my reloads, using 147 gr Montana Golds, I was consistently hitting two inches to the left. I ran a thread and someone explained that the ogive (sp?) of the 147 is so different from a 115 that it is not unusual to have this kind of result. Anyway, good luck with this. I'll be following along because I have considered picking up a P-01 and I'd like to hear more about them.
  7. Following up on Torogi's question, do you mean IPSC or USPSA? If you mean the latter, the SP-01 Shadow and SP-01 Shadow Target are both legal in Production division. As you'll read all over this forum, 75 Shadow (doesn't have the full-length, heavy dust cover found on the SP-01 Shadow) is preferable for IDPA because of the weight issue. The only problem with CZs from the Custom Shop begin legal would be something like the following: When I was in the market for an SP-01 Shadow, I saw a used custom SP-01 Target on sale that a guy had purchased directly from Angus Hobdell at a match. This was not a Shadow Target. The difference is that the Custom Shop had taken out the Firing Pin Block when doing the custom work. One would have to put it back in for it to be legal for USPSA Production division (i.e., the FPB is a standard part of [non-Shadow] SP-01 pistols, and is therefore required). This is probably way more explanation than you wanted/needed . . . Just wanted to provide some clarification.
  8. Welcome. I know you said you are overloaded, but would like to toss in a couple more cents. Definitely rent a CZ from your range, since that is a possibility for you. I would offer a different opinion from the "shoot what you've got" line. Perhaps just an adjustment: if you are *comfortable* shooting the P89 in competition, get some more mags, only load them with 10 rounds, and shoot Production. Doing all the extra reloads makes for great practice. From what I've read in your reply, however, it looks like the trigger on your P89 may be making competitive shooting even more difficult than it needs to be. I've personally never shot a P89. I have shot some semi-autos that would turn me sour on competitive shooting pretty quickly, only because the triggers were never made for competition.
  9. I just recently purchased an SP-01 Shadow, and I love it. As burningsquirrels has said, the 75 Shadow is more versatile for shooting games because IDPA has a weight limit. Since I only shoot USPSA, I like the benefit of the heavier nose. The design without a FPB leads to better trigger pull and reset. I've never heard any problems about accidental discharge (I assume from dropping a cocked weapon with the safety off?). Since you are going to be using it at the range, and maybe in shooting games (where dropping your weapon is strongly discouraged), I wouldn't imagine you'd have any problems.
  10. Thanks, Gerard. BTW, I watched your dry fire video (the New Year's resolution). The shadow is the first DA pistol I've owned. After practicing your dry fire routines in DA, do you notice any problems once your pulling the trigger SA during a stage? I guess I'm just wondering whether practicing every pull with the heavier trigger comes back to bite you when shooting the lighter SA after the initial shot. Thanks.
  11. Rats. I thought about buying a steel guide rod when I was ordering a few other spare parts from CZ Custom, but forgot to do so. Just out of curiosity, how many rounds did you get through before the factory rod broke?
  12. I picked up a new, stock Shadow about a month ago. For the first few times I handled it, I noticed that I could not press the safety all the way up unless the hammer was cocked. (This was the case in several different trips to the range.) While doing a little dry fire practice last night. I happened to push up on the safety even though the hammer was down, and thought to myself, "that's silly . . . I know it won't go up with the hammer down . . ." And then it clicked up into place. Don't get me wrong, I like it better this way. Is this just a "break in" issue? I'm asking primarily because CZs are new to me. If the safety popping up into place with the hammer down is an indication that I farted around and broke something, I thought it would be better to find that out now. Thanks, John
  13. ntphd

    spo1 load

    Thanks. This is really helpful. If it's more accurate, the slight cost upgrade is worth it to me. +1 on cleaner bullets. I've been happy to pay a little extra for the cmj from MG (both 45 ACP and 9mm), for the same reason. +1 also on staying away from molys. I haven't messed with them in 9mm, but tried them out in 45ACP hoping to save a little cash. Whatever I saved was more than used up in extra time cleaning that coating residue out of my gun!
  14. ntphd

    spo1 load

    I don't want to take this thread too far off on a tangent. As I mentioned in another post asking questions about 147 gr. bullets and POI, I'm pretty new to reloading. Sounds like there's no question about the consensus for 124 gr bullets. I would like to inquire, though, why folks choose hollow points for competitive shooting. Do those of you who use them find them to be more accurate? As I recall from looking at the MG site, they're not much more expensive. If people find them more accurate, I'd like to know since I'm planning to order some 124s anyway. Thanks for your patience with these noob questions.
  15. That's good to hear. When I bought the Shadow, I had a couple hundred rounds left over from stuff I loaded for a G34. At around 1.142 they did not stick when I did the drop-in-barrel test, but they also did not chamber completely. When I loaded to 1.1 OAL, I had no trouble at all with the rounds chambering. Only problem was what I mentioned in the OP. I'll have to use a few hundred of these for upcoming matches anyway. I'll see how they work out. Two inches isn't a huge adjustment. I'm only C class, so it's not like I'm lighting any of these stages on fire to start with. Thanks again, folks.
×
×
  • Create New...