Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

xsrdx

Classified
  • Posts

    181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

xsrdx's Achievements

Looks for Range

Looks for Range (1/11)

  1. I was disappointed in this movie - as a huge fan of the TV series, I too thought Colin Farrell was totally wrong as Crockett. Jamie Foxx was excellent as Tubbs, and I really appreciated his "renaissance man" vibe - gunfighter, pilot, cop, romantic. The best part of the show, along with the cars and boats. Didn't like the way it was filmed. MM likes to shoot with available light, which results in a lot of grainy scenes that look like amateur video. It worked in Collateral, for some reason not as effective in MV. Not enough attention to the hardware either. MM apparently gets kickbacks from HK now, and they do make nice guns, but some more variety would have been nice. Who can forget Vincent's up close press check in HEAT, or Kilmer's characters spectacular AR speedload during the bank shootout. MV had it's moments, but aside from the initial BMG rounds into the car-scene, lacked much in the way of memorable gunplay. It thought the headshot scene in the trailer was overwrought - not something MM is typically guilty of. The bank shootout in HEAT was an emotional event - I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw it the first time, and it looks just as good 75 or so viewings later. The "you are THERE" aspect of that scene is the hook, it's as if you are truly in the middle of the fight. A rare achievement, the opening scene in Saving Private Ryan is similarly powerful. Collateral gets better with each viewing - time will tell if the same is true of Miami Vice.
  2. Hmmm - the actual magwell feels pretty light, just assumed it was aluminum. Maybe not... Read a number of posts here discussing fitment problems, but had no trouble. I'm sure it only fits 3rd Gen Glocks, but beyond that I dunno, unless they sent out a few out of spec. Mine is tight, but went on relatively easily.
  3. Just finished installing the "heavy" black DP Ice magwell on my G35 - went on without a hitch, typical superb DP finish. The magwell itself is black matte finished, powder coated aluminum, but the mounting "slug" that slides into the backstrap is brass, adds about 5oz to the gun IIRC. Rock solid on the gun, adds a nice platform to the bottom of the grip also. Came with a replaceable black polymer insert that snaps into the aluminum frame of the magwell, it forms the actual "well" and is easily trimmed to permit proper mag seating. Had to relieve it a few hundredths to fit my Arredondo basepads; now they seat with minimal pressure. Best looking Glock magwell out there, IMO - if you're looking for a magwell that's heavier than aluminum but doesn't pimp out your Glock like brass, this one is very well done.
  4. Speaking of which, what's the split amongst the super squad on cinched mag vs not. I know BC used to shoot a redimag, and I thought I'd seen MV shoot a mag cinch or similar on occasion. I guess we know where Kurt stands on the issue. Taran? Kelly? Matt? Certainly concur with the effect on transitions, but "tensioning the hold" is critical and I've seen a single 30rd mag malf more than once when it's driven in to the ground from the front. Seems to be happen less often with cinched mags. Also, magpuls on the mag bottoms, sideways, keep the mag edges from digging in, and still provide a stable base. Good points though, now I need Kurt to teach me how to Piviot.
  5. I use a Mag Cinch, with the mags set to the same height and adjusted far enough apart to clear the lower. Advantage of mag cinch is not fast reloads, but set at the same height they make a more reliable and stable monopod than a single 30rd. mag. If you never shoot past 200yd you'll probably never need it, but it's handy for long shots from prone.
  6. Plus 3 for the Hogue. Less popular than Ergo grip but it works for me as I grew up shooting the standard grip angle & reach. Essentially a more secure and comfortable standard grip.
  7. Latest from Bill Allred at MPSA: ***************************** In September, MPSA will be holding a major 3 gun match at Thurmont. The dates are September 16, 17 and 18, with setup on the 14th and 15th. There will be 9 stages, 3 each for pistol, rifle and shotgun. The approximate round counts are: Pistol: 74 Rounds + Chrono Rifle: 81 rounds + Chrono Shotgun: 12 Slugs + 37 Shot (size 7 1/2 or smaller) There will be 2 Divisions only: Open and Limited. If the pistol or shotgun you will be shooting does not meet the requirements for Limited under USPSA rules, you will be shooting in the Open Division for all 3 guns. Tactical Division rifles will be allowed in the Limited Division. This is a change from the original match announcement. If you have already registered as Open due to a dot or scope on your rifle (and have a Limited Division pistol and shotgun), you may re-register as Limited by responding to this email. We will be awarding places by aggregate scores, with cash payouts for 1st ($400), 2nd ($200) and 3rd ($100) in each of the 2 Divisions. There will also be plaques for placement in Class and Category as appropriate. Download and print the match application at http://www.mpsa.net and send it in to request your slot. We need ROs, assistant ROs and set up crews. You will receive refunds off of your match fee and priority squadding. We would like the match staff to shoot on Friday, but this is not a requirement. This match is open to current USPSA members only, so if you are a new shooter, get your membership into HQ now to shoot this match. Are you ready? Stand by. Mail! Bill
  8. Absolutely no doubt - I don't even enjoy other general gun forums anymore because so much drivel flies back and forth, and the dispensers of said drivel are often the core members and administrators! ...And if I read one more thread on 762 vs. 556 I'm going to hurl.
  9. In general - this sport will always have limited appeal unless we change it's nature. You can suck at golf and still have a decent day, less true about shooting. It's a tough reality check that many shooters simply don't want to explore. The expiration of the AWB, and the post-9/11 attitude that seems to be more tolerant of RKBA and individual personal security, will have a positive effect - mostly on 3 Gun/MultiGun. This sport sells itself to those willing to endure it's idiosyncracies - the only sure way to widely increase it's appeal may be to radically alter it, probably to a degree none of us would be very enthusiastic about.
  10. Golf and USPSA have a great many similarities - individual effort, the idea of a par performance for a stage or hole, cumulative scoring per stage/per hole, larger events may be held over several days, both are conducted outside and you can practice both without access to a match facility or golf course. The equipment investment is also similar. As noted, the mental game is VERY similar - you are competing against the course, and fellow players/shooters. One of the largest contrasts is that of the comfort and appearance of the venues. I would happily set up an umbrella and lawn chair at Augusta and hang out just for fun - there are few shooting ranges that offer much besides scarred earth berms, weeds and portajohns. That's the nature of shooting - we get the dregs, while golf courses get built in places offering spectacular natural beauty, places where people just want to be - golfing or not. Ranges? Parking always sucks, hotels are miles away, and for spectators it's only a bit more pleasant than a trip to the landfill. The lack of attractive and comfortable shooting venues limits media coverage and spectator participation - shooters understand it, but the uninitiated see only the hillbilly surroundings that often characterize the shooting range.
  11. Hmmm.... Voigt, Cooley, Butler, Burkett, Salmon, West, MILLER, Hill, MILLER, Piatt, Clark, Rhodes, Holmes, Cramblit, Neal.Actually, I think you and your brother might be it?
  12. Kurt, If you'd join USPSA and shoot a pistol classifier or two, you'd lose that "U". We all know you're a closet GM so maybe the joke is on you, sandbagger? I think you sort out USPSA multigun first and grow it, then worry about how to classify long gun shooters. Statistically, if you look at match results the best multigun shooters all tend to be pretty good pistoleros anyway and the results usually line up pretty well with the pistol qualification. While there may be folks (like me) that favor long guns, the disparity is not enough for me to want/need some additional classification. The point has already been made regarding "where do you find the time", and accurately. Finally, someone brought up range limitations. Very few local clubs have the ability to shoot past 100yds, let alone for more than one stage. Shooting pistol stages with a rifle/carbine is fun for awhile, but soon feels like kissing your sister. I don't see enough demand at the local level for exclusive long gun matches, or even multigun, to make this worthwhile- yet.
  13. ..Something tells me the "looking for a fight" garments aren't part of their duty uniform? I see no problem with competing in uniform, as long as it's the official uniform and not some hokey bastardization thereof.
  14. Good comments Mike- FWIW, having shot 3G with USPSA, SMM3G, RM3G, SOF and Kyle's match -I think the JP RM3G, and Kyle's North American Tactical, lead the way in terms of practical, tactical and safe 3 Gun competition, with clear, accomodating, safe and effective rules. No doubt USPSA has a number of other considerations that impact the rulebook, but they'll do well to continue evolving 3Gun in the direction of those matches. CLG
  15. As noted, if you cut the foam carefully, a Pelican 1750 will carry a scoped AR, limited shotgun and pistol, with room for a few small accessories. Not sure if you can get 3 open guns in there, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone found a way.
×
×
  • Create New...