Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

lcarr

Classified
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lcarr

  1. I just noticed that .357 SIG is allowed to be major in Single-Stack now. Does that mean that .38 Super can be major now, too (if only loaded to 8 rounds)?
  2. My favorite Irish Whiskey is Black Bush. I got turned on to it when I toured the Bushmills Distillery in Northern Ireland. It's a blended, so it's relatively inexpensive at about $30, at least when compared to the single malts. It's aged in rum casks so it has a slightly sweeter taste than most whiskeys. It also has a peaty flavor. Lincoln
  3. One idea I've had for pistol, and I think would also be very interesting with rifle, is to do away with Major/Minor scoring, but for final score mutiply hit factor by power factor, i.e., score on a state would be (points * power factor)/time. For local matches, one could use declared power factors while for major matches the chronograph would give one's actual power factor. I'm not sure where the most competitive "point" on the scale would be, but I don't think one could argue that .308 was being short-changed, like making .223 major. Don't the new rules lower major to the point where one could make it with one of the new AR calibers, like 6.8mm SPC or 6.5mm Grendel? If so, it would seem that .223 is on its way out, anyway. Lincoln
  4. I don't consciously shoot with my mouth open, but I guess I don't make a conscious effort to keep it shut, either. Would you please go into more detail about what the problem would be? I don't think I've ever heard of this before. Lincoln
  5. Thanks for the ideas. I just did a quick search for the "Sound Defenders" ear plugs and found http://www.earmolds.com/sound_plugs.htm. However, according to the site, the NRR is only 25db. Also, there is a statement in the text, "Remember too that when tightly and completely inserted, compressible foam HPDs have potentially higher NRRs than custom molded devices, simply because there is less bulk in the ear to cause possible shifting of the device and because the seal takes place entirely within the ear canal." So, it's still not clear to me that they are going to do better than the 33db plugs I am using now, since I am very careful to get a good seal with them. Lincoln
  6. Because the weather is getting colder and because of the locations of local ranges, I have to do at least 2/3 of my practice indoors. Not too long ago, I switched to shooting Open with an SVI IMM Open gun. It is a little loud. I went from using 30db ear plugs with 19db electronic muffs to using 33db ear plugs with 30db conventional muffs. However, I still feel like I've been to a rock concert after practicing. I am experiencing (hopefully temporary) diminished hearing and ringing even when using so much hearing protection that I can barely hear my timer. I fear that I am doing permanent damage and am looking for suggestions about what I could do differently when practicing indoors. Some questions I have are as follows: 1. I have read all of the threads I could find on hearing protection, etc. However, is there something I am missing? Is there hearing protection out there rated even higher than the 33db plugs and 30db muffs I'm using currently? What are you other Open shooters using when practicing indoors? Be sure to speak up so that I can hear you. 2. Should I just practice with an iron sighted, nonported gun? 3. Should I get a .22 conversion for my Open gun? This would at least let me practice with my competition gun's sight, trigger, etc.; even though the recoil characteristics would be completely different. 4. Should I get a nonported barrel for my Open gun? This seems like a good alternative at first, but, with more thought, I'm not sure that it would be any better than a .22 conversion. Lincoln
  7. In no particular order: The Empire Strikes Back ("Do or do not. There is no 'try.'"--who does that sound like? :^) Raiders of the Lost Ark (nice swordsmanship...BANG!) Heat ("That's the discipline.") Tombstone ("I'm your huckleberry.") Legends of the Fall ("How I wanted to take their scalps, but it was not my kill.") Sgt. York ("I think these sights are a little off.") Highlander ("...with heart, faith, and steel.") Rough Riders ("The best way to win the argument is to kill the other fellah.") Pulp Fiction ("If she comes back here and finds a bunch of gangsters doing gangter shit...") Die Hard ("Yipee-kai-aye...") A couple that didn't make the 10 round limit: Dr. No Excalibur Lincoln
  8. At the 3 Gun Nationals, I saw at least 2 shooters using a carrier for shotgun speedloaders that was worn on the thigh and held 6 loaders. I asked one of the shooters where he got it, but he couldn't remember the name of the company that made it. After poking around on the internet, I can't find it anywhere. Does anyone know who makes it? Thanks, Lincoln
  9. Does this mean your experiment with the FAL and .260 Remington is over? Lincoln
  10. I, too, was Donnie Darko. This brings up the question: would Donnie Darko like Donnie Darko? Lincoln
  11. I'm sorry for not being clearer. By using the term "raw sense data," I was trying to get across the notion of bare experience, before any interpretation is put to it, even any interpretation about a subject/object distinction. I think we're saying similar things. Lincoln
  12. You definitely got a lot more out of it than I did. I guess I lost patience and stopped trying to interpret it too soon. As to "If we know something by way of direct experience there's no need to debate it," I guess that depends on what you mean by "know." Raw sense data is always "true," insofar as such data isn't really true or false, but, whenever we add an interpretation to it, that interpretation does have a truth value that could be correct or incorrect. If I see sense data X, the raw data itself can't be "wrong" because it isn't a proposition that has a truth value. However, once I say, "X is a cow," that statement could be true or false. (Of course, I'm coming at this from the perspective of Western hard, cold, analytical philosophy. I know very, very little about Eastern philosophy.) Lincoln
  13. When I was in school I took a lot of philosophy classes. Once, when I was taking a course on metaphysics, my professor, Susan Haack, told me that, when something is difficult to understand, there are two possibilites: either the author is trying to say something very profound but difficult to get across, or the author is just an idiot. Sometimes we have to make this determination before investing too much time in interpreting something. Unfortunately, I had to put Donnie Darko in the latter category. Lincoln
  14. I, too, am an INTJ. I thought that only something like 2% of the population were INTJs, yet we seem to be getting proportionately more than that in this thread. I wonder, along with some previous posters, whether INTJ's are disproportionately represented in shooting. Lincoln
  15. Quote: from xcount on 4:50 pm on Mar. 4, 2003 Are the 200s & 220s you mention round nosed? Lead or jacketed? If JRN I might have to try some. The 220s I've tried are the plated ones from West Coast Bullet. I've tried CCI and West Coast 200s. All seem to have the same truncated cone shape. It's hard to find something that's round like a .45 FMJ in 10mm. Lincoln
  16. Quote: from spook on 3:36 am on Mar. 4, 2003 If I had a 610, I'd probably use N320 under a 180 grain bullet. While it seems like people have settled on 180gr bullets for semi-autos in IPSC, don't forget that there are 200gr and 220gr 10mm bullets available. 220s are exceptionally soft and might work well in a revolver, where you don't have a slide helping to disperse felt recoil. Lincoln
  17. A while back as I recall, there was an article in _Front Sight_ detailing two different methods for doing revolver reloads. I've been going through all of my old _Front Sights_, but can't find it. However, I am missing a couple of issues. Does anyone know in which issue the article occured? Thanks, Lincoln
  18. Quote: from Flexmoney on 1:34 pm on Jan. 17, 2003 ...how many Glock 40's are sold??? If you had a Glock, why wouldn't you go to Production? Lincoln
  19. Quote: from TDean on 2:37 pm on Jan. 15, 2003 With full power stuff (180gr@1300fps), you'll see a bulge. Shooting 180's at 950fps, there's a slight bulge, but it's hard to see. My experience is a little different. Shooting my IPSC loads, 200@850, in my stock G20 barrel, the bulge is enough that, if the brass is resized through my Dillon, a round will still lock up my SVI single stack 10mm bigger than Hell. It's bad enough that, were I to start shooting my G20 in IPSC again seriously, I would be tempted to get an aftermarket barrel that isn't so hard on the brass. Lincoln
  20. Off topic, have you tried Wilson 10mm mags? No, I've never seen them. Last time I checked, they were out of production and had been for some time. Lincoln
  21. Quote: from DBChaffin on 10:48 am on Jan. 14, 2003 Lincoln, I assume you still shoot your SV 10mm singlestack? What mags do you use? What capacity (9 or 10)? Yeah, I'm still shooting it until I get my Open gun. I'm using McCormick and Metalform 9 rounders, which are so identical that I believe they're made by the same OEM. After trying at least three different types, I haven't found a reliable 10 rounder. To get the thread back on track, if I wanted to be completely competitive, I would get a new .45ACP breech face and barrel, and use 10 .45ACP mags. :^) I will agree that, obviously, the hole at the bottom of a doublestack with a magwell is bigger than the hole at the bottom of a single stack with a magwell. Also, the tapered double stack mag makes it even easier. However, at some point there are diminishing returns. A 3' diameter magwell probably isn't measurably superior to a 2' diameter magwell. :^) Lincoln (Edited by lcarr at 11:13 am on Jan. 14, 2003) (Edited by lcarr at 11:38 am on Jan. 14, 2003)
  22. Quote: from 2alpha on 12:55 am on Jan. 14, 2003 Still waiting for answers to the Nationals question. Could I have my giant SVI single stack magwell? If so, I don't think it would make much difference. Also, note that "competitive" doesn't necessarily mean "resoundingly superior," just not enough of a difference to matter. If a piece of equipment can be used to win, outright, a competition, then it is by definition "competitive." Do you honestly think that TGO would deliberately handicap himself, at the Nationals? Lincoln (Edited by lcarr at 9:09 am on Jan. 14, 2003)
  23. (Edited by lcarr at 9:08 am on Jan. 14, 2003)
  24. Quote: from 2alpha on 11:39 am on Jan. 13, 2003 I don't think that proves the standard 1911 has a division it is truly competitive in. So, the fact that a piece of equipment was used to win the Nationals of a given division is not proof that that equipment is competitive in that division? OK. Lincoln
  25. Quote: from 2alpha on 6:29 pm on Jan. 12, 2003 Isn't it ironic that the one pistol that doesn't have a division it is truly competitive in is the standard 1911? TGO won L10 at the Factory Gun Nationals with a single stack, albeit with a 6" slide. Lincoln
×
×
  • Create New...