Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

NickBlasta

Classifieds
  • Posts

    428
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    WA

Recent Profile Visitors

1,117 profile views

NickBlasta's Achievements

Looks for Target

Looks for Target (4/11)

  1. Just like practicing any skill, you make huge gains in the beginning and then it takes more and more repetition for incremental gains. The 85% to 95% gap represents that incremental gain delta for most people very well I think.
  2. Very little handgun experience to start, classified into C, made master in 6 months and GM 17 months after that. Bit less than 2 years.
  3. I cut a piece out of my holster body (bladetech) for mine with the old dremel.
  4. 12 scoring hits are available. 12 penalties can be assessed.
  5. Said rule only applies for the referenced reason, trying to give general procedural when specific ones should be used. In this case two specific penalties are being given. There is nothing in the rulebook that says two (or more) specific procedurals can't be given for one shot. The correct number of procedurals is 12.
  6. You would need a plate that raised the optic up above the slide, because the optic is too big for the cut itself.
  7. Have one in my hands and I can tell you it doesn't fit the cut.
  8. Any replacement grip module is allowed if it meets the criteria in 21.4.
  9. Can use the P10 plates. They're the same size?
  10. Is there anywhere to buy the factory plates in the US?
  11. The language you use is important. It helps to be up front that a service is being provided to the buyer rather than a product. A product can or can not be delivered, pretty black and white. A service you are arguably already providing (registering a person, squadding them, building the match on their behalf) it can help you win chargebacks more easily.
  12. You're right, I personally wouldn't buy one without a lifetime warranty.
  13. Only if it pokes out the sides.
  14. To be fair there's an extra level of complexity where the merchant has an agreement with the credit card company, listing where chargebacks are and aren't acceptable. The person organizing the match is bound to this merchant agreement, even where contracts you make with the cardbearer might contradict it. For example if my merchant agreement with the CC company says "cardbearer may chargeback in instances where the product/service is not received or is significantly different from described", nothing I try and bind the cardholder to in terms of agreeing to no refunds will fly. I could say 'but you said you were fine with no refunds' and the CC company will say 'you agreed to give refunds under these conditions'. I speak as a merchant who sells nonrefundable deposits and wins chargebacks. So in winning the chargeback what he did may have been "legal", you can only argue about whether or not it was morally correct.
×
×
  • Create New...