Kingman Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 I have both. Running the same drills I'm a hair faster with the svi shorty with steel grip. My other gun is longer 7" overall 5" slide, cheely comp and plastic grip. I'm talking hundredths in splits and transitions. 49oz empty vs 38oz empty. The bigger gun is gentle. I could hand it to anyone to shoot it doesn't do a lot of smacking around. The concussion is gentler. Overall a smoother ride. Shorty cycles faster, is louder 2 hybrid ports, and I feel it points a bit better. It is not a gentle gun to shoot. It is super flat, but you feel it in your hand. That being said I have a new svi on order. It'll be exactly the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waynes_world_45 Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I HAD a shorty. It wasn't for me. Some like it, but I think a 5" shoots softer. With a Ti comp, the swing weight is barely noticeable. ^^This^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CocoBolo Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 (edited) You would be much better off spending your money on a Gym membership. Yeah I said that, I think movement skills and quick movement are huge in USPSA and not so big in steel challenge. I have taken old school guns spent a butt ton of money modernizing them with little improvement. Get a reliable gun you can shoot without it hurting your hand, and go for it. Edited July 22, 2016 by CocoBolo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBets Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) For that matter if you shoot a 30 round stick you literally shoot a pound out of the gun on a long course. It's easy to chase gains with equipment for little usual gain. It's hard to chase gains through range time 4-5 days a week 3-4 hours a day. But one will make you a GM. The other will not. Ask Max and his Trubore "20 year old technology" gun. We have had this exact talk as a matter of fact Definitely pick one you like and go practice. I'm fairly certain if a gun ever revolutionized open we would all hear about it in a few days worth of Internet Edited July 23, 2016 by BigBets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPostman Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) For that matter if you shoot a 30 round stick you literally shoot a pound out of the gun on a long course. It's easy to chase gains with equipment for little usual gain. It's hard to chase gains through range time 4-5 days a week 3-4 hours a day. But one will make you a GM. The other will not. Ask Max and his Trubore "20 year old technology" gun. We have had this exact talk as a matter of fact Definitely pick one you like and go practice. I'm fairly certain if a gun ever revolutionized open we would all hear about it in a few days worth of Internet Excellent answer! I have a steel grip on my open gun and it weighs 53oz with no mag inserted. I just workout my upper body with various shoulder and grip exercises, plus abs and lateral obliques so I can swivel at the waist and maintain a good grip and sight picture. This is just the physical training. I dry fire and practice transitions with a full 29 roundmag of dummy rounds plus the occasional live fire practice for focus on grip and watching the dot. All these things have come together to greatly improve my shooting. Just like he says, pick a gun and practice, practice and then practice some more. You won't notice the weight since you shoot it all the time. Edited July 23, 2016 by MrPostman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzt Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I think weight distribution is more important than actual weight. For example, my Sig 1911 weighs 43oz and balances perfectly. My Open gun also weighs 43oz with a plastic grip and Al magwell, but is long dust cover, bull barrel and looong steel 4-chamber, 5-port comp To call it nose heavy is an understatement. It is definitely an "old" style design. On any kind of transition I am much faster with my 1911 than with my 2011. That being said, I'm faster on double taps with the 2011. The two 3/16" poppels combine with the comp to make a pretty flat shooting gun, so recoil is straight back instead of up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamind Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 I will keep my old style open gun and spend the money I'm saving on ammo and practice that will always give you better result . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whoops! Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 I like the way the short gun moves and balances. That being said, the most important things in my book are the comp and porting. I'm not talking bigger is better either (especially if it's a barrel mounted comp) but, both are definitely preferred over rather it's a shorty or a full-size. Then, the weight of the barrel and comp make a huge difference. Even though the length will factor in, a bull barrel and big steel comp will factor in even more regardless of rather it's a shorty or a full-size. Also, sometimes the difference between a shorty and a full-size is an inch. The stock Tru-bor to stock Match Master barrel length difference is .74" according to STI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digi531 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 There are many variables in an open design and the " feel " is a personal preference, as already mentioned above. I' be built a shorty ( 41/4 barrel and very short slide and did not like it much, fast but just to violent ( for me ). I've built a mid size using a 4.8 inch barrel with a steel cone comp and four small popples. It was fast, had nice balance, transition well and was an improvement over the real shorty type. I'm a senior now and my last two builds were full size ( 5 inch slide ) with a bull 5.4 inch barrel and TI comp, with 4 rather large popples 5/32 holes and usual type slide cuts with aluminum grip and RTS2. This set up is working well ( for me ) and the gun shoots great and EASY to handle and transition with a 170 PF. Also, I agree with above post, there are no magic open designs or the " new " generation design ( I've seen the Atlas video ) that will make all other obsolete, but people are entitled to their own opinions, good, bad or indifferent. As its always been, it's the ( person ) behind the tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now