display

I'm not so worried about the cost. I saw a video that this gun cycled a bit quicker than the Ruger, thats the only reason I have really considered it. But it also had some slight feeding problems, so maybe its too quick and/or the magazine spring is too weak? So far it looks like im going with the ruger. Basically the exact build you have azshooter.

Yes, they just do not stick out any.

How much weight did you drop going with the carbon barrel? I'm torn between one of these and the Mark IV lite.

My buddy sent an email today, got this in return... " as long as the cuts don't perforate the slide". So I guess we can mill away just make sure to leave a few thou at the bottom of that hole!

So it appears someone could run this gun in production then too... that is very odd. Does USPSA have a list of approved vendors of modified guns that are not legal per the words but legal to shoot?

Hello, I was wanting a clarification on the rule 21.2b for Carry Optics. Does it consider all of the milled out spaces (besides the hole by the barrel) on this one legal? Its the TTI combat master if the picture doesn't show up below. I saw a photo earlier of the high lady in CO at the nats using this piece with the only difference being the hole was not milled all the way through and it didn't have the magwell. It seems to me that all of the extra milling, specifically the front lower part being removed and the middle part where it says combat master at minimum, would fall under "Cuts that are designed to specifically or significantly lighten the slide, such as holes, are ruled as competitive advantage and prohibited." I just would like to have this clarified before I buy/build my new gun! Thanks!