Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

seadog_99

Classified
  • Posts

    120
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    KCMO
  • Real Name
    Bob Barker

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

seadog_99's Achievements

Looks for Range

Looks for Range (1/11)

  1. Points shot (score on targets minus penalties) and stage points (competitors hit factor percentage of the hhf multiplied by total possible points for the stage) aren't the same. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Most shooters won't paste a target with a penalty before getting a shooter's attention out of courtesy, not because it's a rule violation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. In my experience the RO will generally announce that they will be scoring in this manner and let shooters know that they need to appoint a proxy to check their targets during the scoring process and before they're pasted. That being said, I NEVER paste a target with a penalty without getting the shooters attention first. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. Since it's "based ALMOST exactly on USPSA..." rules I'd say they can do whatever they want. Why don't they just USE the USPSA rulebook and affiliate? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. When I first began shooting USPSA my home club at the time (which was very active) didn't have much more than the bare minimum, usually in the form of a classifier match in the spring. When I relocated I was surprised to find that most of the clubs in my new area had a classifier at every match. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. ^^^This. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. Absolutely. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Did you read my post? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. Not sure where you're shooting but Open isn't necessarily king and DEFINITELY isn't "wiping the floor with" Lim, Prod, or SS shooters in our area. It certainly isn't only Open shooters that are against PCC either. I find it interesting that there isn't more pushback against the eased safety rules that the red-headed stepdivision gets. Also, many of my friends and I are concerned that a shooter that wants to place higher will abandon the work it takes to improve at the more difficult pistol discipline and go straight to the PCC, no reload, easy accuracy solution. If they go to PCC to get a better understanding of the game then pick up the pistol and put in the work then competition benefits. If they pick up the PCC and decide it's so much easier than putting in practice and improving then pistol competition may suffer. Time will tell I guess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. From 2.4: "At level II or higher matches, Safety Areas must include a table with the safe direction and boundaries clearly shown." Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. Yes, it has. The DQ anyway, the other particulars I can't speak about because I don't know exactly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Apparently PCCs are inherently safer than pistols too as they can un-bag at a berm, carry around their firearm, and not get a dq. A pistol shooter has one foot touching outside of the safe area that they walked 200yds to get to while bagging/unbagging their pistol and they're subject to DQ. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. I believe the intent may be to go the way of Steel Challenge and introduce enough divisions and disciplines to allow nearly every participant to tell their friends that don't know better that they "won their division". Even if that means shooting a rifle in a pistol game. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. I only use the AZS app. It still works. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...