Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

darr3239

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

darr3239's Achievements

Looks for Range

Looks for Range (1/11)

  1. Titegroup does seem to be about $2.00 cheaper per pound than Bullseye. I would have figured it would have been the other way around. So, I guess that's why most seem to be using it.
  2. Yep. I have no idea about cleanliness. I just assumed that Titegroup was cleaner since it's newer, and Bullseye is older than dirt. I've shot a lot of Bullseye and Unique but no Titegroup.
  3. The burn rates of Titegroup and Bullseye are apparently equal according to a burn rate chart I looked at. Is there any real performance difference other than Titegroup burning cleaner?
  4. Like I said, you have to call them. That's how I got mine.
  5. Blade-Tech also. It's not an option yet on their website, but call them and they will make it for you.
  6. darr3239

    Front Fell Off

    No way I could concentrate on the rest of the posts after watching that video!
  7. After researching, I've found it must be an individual preference, with people liking the recoil impulse of one or the other. I ended up buying the 124s, since most seem to be using that bullet weight, and found a great deal on FMJs which should aid in the accuracy department.
  8. For those using 147 gr. bullets, what's the advantage over 124?
×
×
  • Create New...